JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vogt, B. A.

Vol. 299, Issue 3, 840-848, December 2001

Colocalization of µ-Opioid Receptors and Activated G-Proteins in Rat Cingulate Cortex

Leslie J. Vogt , Laura J. Sim-Selley, Steven R. Childers, Ronald G. Wiley and Brent A. Vogt

Cingulum NeuroSciences Institute, Syracuse, New York (L.J.V., B.A.V.); Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and Center for Investigative Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (L.J.V., S.R.C., B.A.V.); Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia (L.J.S.-S.); and Neurology Service (127), Veterans Administration Medical Center, and Departments of Neurology and Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee (R.G.W.)

Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has a role in pain processing, however, little is known about opioid system organization and actions. This rodent study defines opioid architecture in the perigenual and midcingulate divisions of ACC, relates µ-opioid receptor binding and G-protein activation, and localizes such binding to afferent axons with knife-cut lesions and specifically to noradrenergic terminals with immunotoxin lesions (anti-dopamine beta -hydroxylase-saporin; anti-DBH-saporin). [3H]Tyr-D-AlaGly-MePhe-Gly-ol (DAMGO) binding was highest in perigenual areas 32 and 24 with a peak in layer I. Midcingulate area 24' and posterior cingulate area 29 had overall lower binding in each layer. In contrast, DAMGO-stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(gamma -thio)-triphosphate (GTPgamma S) binding in area 24' was similar to that in area 24, whereas area 29 had low and homogeneous binding. Undercut lesions reduced [3H]DAMGO binding in all layers with the greatest loss in layer I (-65%), whereas DAMGO-stimulated [35S]GTPgamma S binding losses occurred in only layers I-III. Anti-DBH-saporin reduced [3H]DAMGO binding in layer I of area 24; DAMGO-stimulated [35S]GTPgamma S binding was unchanged in areas 24' and 29. Correlation analysis of receptor and G-protein activation before and after undercut lesions suggested there were a greater number of DAMGO receptor sites for each G-protein on axons, than on somata and proximal dendrites. Finally, perigenual and midcingulate cortices have different opioid architectures due to a higher proportion of µ-opioid receptors expressed by afferent axons in areas 24 and 32.


0022-3565/01/2993-0840$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2001 by U.S. Government






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.