![]() |
|
|
Vol. 298, Issue 3, 1015-1020, September 2001
-Opioid Receptor Correlates with, but Does Not Require, G
Protein Activation
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of
California, Los Angeles, California (P.A.Z., D.E.K., C.J.E.); and
Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
(J.B.T., F.I.C.)
In this study, we explored the relationship between
ligand-induced regulation of surface
opioid receptors and G protein activation. G protein activation was assessed with
[35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate
(GTP
S) binding assays conducted at both 37 and 0°C.
Ligand-independent (constitutive) activity of the
-receptor was
readily observed when the [35S]GTP
S binding assay was
performed at 37°C. We identified a new class of alkaloid inverse
agonists (RTI-5989-1, RTI-5989-23, RTI-5989-25), which are more potent
than the previously described peptide inverse agonist ICI-174864
(N,N-diallyl-Tyr-Aib-Aib-Phe-Leu).
Treatment with these inverse agonists for 18 h caused
up-regulation of surface receptors. Eighteen-hour treatment with
etorphine resulted in approximately 90% loss of surface receptor,
whereas fentanyl, diprenorphine, and morphine caused between 20 and
50% loss. The abilities of ligands to modulate
[35S]GTP
S binding at 37°C showed a strong
correlation with their abilities to regulate surface receptor number
(r2 = 0.86). Interestingly, the ability
of fentanyl to activate G proteins was markedly temperature sensitive.
Fentanyl showed no stimulation of [35S]GTP
S binding at
0°C but was as efficacious as etorphine, morphine, and diprenorphine
at 37°C. Neither the ligand-induced receptor increases nor decreases
were perturbed by pertussis toxin pretreatment, suggesting that
functional G proteins are not required for ligand-regulated
-opioid
receptor trafficking.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. D. Marczak, Y. Jinsmaa, T. Li, S. D. Bryant, Y. Tsuda, Y. Okada, and L. H. Lazarus [N-Allyl-Dmt1]-Endomorphins Are {micro}-Opioid Receptor Antagonists Lacking Inverse Agonist Properties J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 374 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wang, X. Sun, and W. Sadee Different Effects of Opioid Antagonists on {micro}-, {delta}-, and {kappa}-Opioid Receptors with and without Agonist Pretreatment J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 544 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Thielemans, I. Depoortere, J. Perret, P. Robberecht, Y. Liu, T. Thijs, C. Carreras, E. Burgeon, and T. L. Peeters Desensitization of the Human Motilin Receptor by Motilides J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1397 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tryoen-Toth, F. M. Decaillot, D. Filliol, K. Befort, L. H. Lazarus, P. W. Schiller, H. Schmidhammer, and B. L. Kieffer Inverse Agonism and Neutral Antagonism at Wild-Type and Constitutively Active Mutant Delta Opioid Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2005; 313(1): 410 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kenakin Efficacy as a Vector: the Relative Prevalence and Paucity of Inverse Agonism Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 2 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-G. Liu and P. L. Prather Chronic Agonist Treatment Converts Antagonists into Inverse Agonists at delta -Opioid Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2002; 302(3): 1070 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||