JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaki, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaki, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, C. J.

Vol. 298, Issue 3, 1015-1020, September 2001

Agonist-, Antagonist-, and Inverse Agonist-Regulated Trafficking of the delta -Opioid Receptor Correlates with, but Does Not Require, G Protein Activation

Paulette A. Zaki, Duane E. Keith, Jr., James B. Thomas, F. I. Carroll and Christopher J. Evans

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California (P.A.Z., D.E.K., C.J.E.); and Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (J.B.T., F.I.C.)

In this study, we explored the relationship between ligand-induced regulation of surface delta  opioid receptors and G protein activation. G protein activation was assessed with [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate (GTPgamma S) binding assays conducted at both 37 and 0°C. Ligand-independent (constitutive) activity of the delta -receptor was readily observed when the [35S]GTPgamma S binding assay was performed at 37°C. We identified a new class of alkaloid inverse agonists (RTI-5989-1, RTI-5989-23, RTI-5989-25), which are more potent than the previously described peptide inverse agonist ICI-174864 (N,N-diallyl-Tyr-Aib-Aib-Phe-Leu). Treatment with these inverse agonists for 18 h caused up-regulation of surface receptors. Eighteen-hour treatment with etorphine resulted in approximately 90% loss of surface receptor, whereas fentanyl, diprenorphine, and morphine caused between 20 and 50% loss. The abilities of ligands to modulate [35S]GTPgamma S binding at 37°C showed a strong correlation with their abilities to regulate surface receptor number (r2 = 0.86). Interestingly, the ability of fentanyl to activate G proteins was markedly temperature sensitive. Fentanyl showed no stimulation of [35S]GTPgamma S binding at 0°C but was as efficacious as etorphine, morphine, and diprenorphine at 37°C. Neither the ligand-induced receptor increases nor decreases were perturbed by pertussis toxin pretreatment, suggesting that functional G proteins are not required for ligand-regulated delta -opioid receptor trafficking.


0022-3565/01/2983-1015$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. D. Marczak, Y. Jinsmaa, T. Li, S. D. Bryant, Y. Tsuda, Y. Okada, and L. H. Lazarus
[N-Allyl-Dmt1]-Endomorphins Are {micro}-Opioid Receptor Antagonists Lacking Inverse Agonist Properties
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 374 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. Wang, X. Sun, and W. Sadee
Different Effects of Opioid Antagonists on {micro}-, {delta}-, and {kappa}-Opioid Receptors with and without Agonist Pretreatment
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 544 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
L. Thielemans, I. Depoortere, J. Perret, P. Robberecht, Y. Liu, T. Thijs, C. Carreras, E. Burgeon, and T. L. Peeters
Desensitization of the Human Motilin Receptor by Motilides
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2005; 313(3): 1397 - 1405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. Tryoen-Toth, F. M. Decaillot, D. Filliol, K. Befort, L. H. Lazarus, P. W. Schiller, H. Schmidhammer, and B. L. Kieffer
Inverse Agonism and Neutral Antagonism at Wild-Type and Constitutively Active Mutant Delta Opioid Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2005; 313(1): 410 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. Kenakin
Efficacy as a Vector: the Relative Prevalence and Paucity of Inverse Agonism
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2004; 65(1): 2 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J.-G. Liu and P. L. Prather
Chronic Agonist Treatment Converts Antagonists into Inverse Agonists at delta -Opioid Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2002; 302(3): 1070 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.