JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meririnne, E.
Right arrow Articles by Seppälä, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meririnne, E.
Right arrow Articles by Seppälä, T.

Vol. 298, Issue 2, 539-550, August 2001

Rewarding Properties of Methylphenidate: Sensitization by Prior Exposure to the Drug and Effects of Dopamine D1- and D2-Receptor Antagonists

Esa Meririnne, Aino Kankaanpää and Timo Seppälä

National Public Health Institute, Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Research, Drug Research Unit, Helsinki, Finland

In drug addiction, a sensitization phenomenon has been postulated to play a critical role. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether sensitization occurs to the rewarding properties of methylphenidate, a psychostimulant drug known to possess abuse potential, as assessed with the biased conditioned place preference method in rats. In addition, since the brain dopaminergic system is considered to be important in drug-reward, the involvement of dopamine D1- and D2-receptors both in the rewarding properties of methylphenidate and in sensitization to these properties was assessed. Conditioning with methylphenidate at doses of 1.25 to 20 mg/kg increased preference for the paired environment, whereas a dose of 0.31 mg/kg was ineffective. However, following the 7-day sensitization treatment with methylphenidate (0.62-20 mg/kg), conditioning with a dose of 0.31 mg/kg resulted in an increased preference for the paired environment, i.e., the rewarding properties of methylphenidate appeared to be sensitized. Control experiments indicated that the enhancement of preference was not due to attenuation of sensitization treatment-induced withdrawal nor to tolerance to aversive properties of methylphenidate. When conditioned with methylphenidate, D1-antagonist SCH 23390 but not D2-antagonist raclopride prevented place preference. However, when coadministered with methylphenidate during the sensitization treatment, both SCH 23390 and raclopride prevented the development of sensitization. These data indicate that the rewarding properties of methylphenidate are sensitized by prior exposure to the drug and that both D1- and D2-receptors, the latter of which possibly more specifically, appear to be involved in the development of this sensitization.


0022-3565/01/2982-0539$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 2001 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.