![]() |
|
|
Vol. 296, Issue 3, 663-668, March 2001
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, University
of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas (K.K.R, J.D.); Section of
Environmental Toxicology, GSF-Institut für Toxikologie,
Neuherberg, Germany (K.K.R.)
One hundred years ago, Warren established for the first time a
quantitative link between dose and time while studying the toxicity of
sodium chloride in Daphnia magna (Straus). During this
century, many toxicologists in different contexts returned to this
idea, which has become known as Haber's Rule of inhalation toxicology.
Most attempts to explore this relationship ended in frustration because
of the observed deviations from it, which were unfortunately called
exceptions. Thus, toxicologists concentrated on the quantitative
relationship between dose and effect under mostly isotemporal
conditions, while time was assigned such arbitrary, semiquantitative
designations as acute, subacute, subchronic, and chronic. Time
itself as a quantifiable variable of toxicity was seldom studied and
when it was examined, it was often not done under isodosic
(steady-state) conditions. A recent analysis of time as a variable of
toxicity indicated the existence of at least three independent time
scales (toxicokinetic, toxicodynamic, exposure frequency/duration) in
toxicological studies, which interact with dose and effect to yield the
enormous complexity known to every toxicologist. Based on prototypical
examples when toxicokinetic (dioxins, chloroacetic acid), toxicodynamic
(nitrosamines, soman, sarin, tabun), exposure frequency (methylene
chloride), or other experimental design-related conditions
(HgCl2, CdCl2) represent the critical time
scale, the general validity of the c × t = k concept will be discussed as a starting point
for a theory of toxicology. As endpoints of toxicity, (delayed) acute
toxicity, blood dyscrasias, and cancer will be used to illustrate the
critical conditions needed to demonstrate the validity of this theory. The relevance of this theory to the pharmacologic action of chemicals and its implication for the therapeutic index are also discussed.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Meek and J. Doull Pragmatic Challenges for the Vision of Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century in a Regulatory Context: Another Ames Test? ...or a New Edition of "the Red Book"? Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2009; 108(1): 19 - 21. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Doull Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment Human and Experimental Toxicology, January 1, 2006; 25(1): 44 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Franczak, A. Nynca, K. E. Valdez, K. M. Mizinga, and B. K. Petroff Effects of Acute and Chronic Exposure to the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Agonist 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin on the Transition to Reproductive Senescence in Female Sprague-Dawley Rats Biol Reprod, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 125 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||