![]() |
|
|
Vol. 292, Issue 3, 929-938, March 2000
Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Pharmacology
(E.K.J.) and Medicine (R.K.D., E.K.J.), University of Pittsburgh
Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Departments of Medicine
and Pharmacology, Divisions of Cardiology (M.B.F., C.E.V., J.V.V.) and
Clinical Pharmacology (J.J.M.), Vanderbilt University School of
Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
Recent studies have demonstrated that three membrane-permeant
A1 receptor antagonists reduced infarct size in a model of
ischemia followed by brief reperfusion. However, it was not determined whether cardioprotection was mediated by nonspecific intracellular effects of these highly lipophilic drugs and whether the antagonists only delayed myocardial necrosis without affecting the ultimate infarct
size. In the present study, closed-chest dogs were subjected to 90 min
of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and 72 h of
reperfusion and received either a nonmembrane-permeant adenosine
receptor blocker that is devoid of direct intracellular effects and is
6-fold selective for the A1 receptor
[1,3-dipropyl-8-p-sulfophenylxanthine (DPSPX);
n = 11] or vehicle (n = 12).
DPSPX was administered as three 200-mg boluses 60 min before and 30 and
120 min after reperfusion. The area of necrosis was determined
histologically and expressed as a percentage of the area at risk.
Baseline predictors of infarct size were similar in the two groups. The
ratio of the area of necrosis to the area at risk was less in the DPSPX
group (17.8 ± 4.3% versus 35.0 ± 1.9%;
P = .012), and DPSPX improved regional ventricular
function. Under both basal and stimulated (formyl-Met-Leu-Phe) conditions, suspensions of human neutrophils generated extracellular adenosine levels (approximately 50 nM) sufficient to activate A1 receptors. Moreover, both DPSPX and
1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine, a selective A1 receptor
antagonist, significantly reduced the chemoattractant response of
neutrophils to formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. We conclude that blockade of
A1 adenosine receptors attenuates myocardial
ischemic/reperfusion injury, possibly in part by decreasing the
chemoattractant response of neutrophils.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. R. Lankford, J.-N. Yang, R. Rose'Meyer, B. A. French, G. P. Matherne, B. B. Fredholm, and Z. Yang Effect of modulating cardiac A1 adenosine receptor expression on protection with ischemic preconditioning Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): H1469 - H1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Reichelt, L. Willems, J. G. Molina, C.-X. Sun, J. C. Noble, K. J. Ashton, J. Schnermann, M. R. Blackburn, and J. P. Headrick Genetic Deletion of the A1 Adenosine Receptor Limits Myocardial Ischemic Tolerance Circ. Res., February 18, 2005; 96(3): 363 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Auchampach, X. Jin, J. Moore, T. C. Wan, L. M. Kreckler, Z.-D. Ge, J. Narayanan, E. Whalley, W. Kiesman, B. Ticho, et al. Comparison of Three Different A1 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists on Infarct Size and Multiple Cycle Ischemic Preconditioning in Anesthetized Dogs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2004; 308(3): 846 - 856. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q.-D. Wang, J. Pernow, P.-O. Sjoquist, and L. Ryden Pharmacological possibilities for protection against myocardial reperfusion injury Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2002; 55(1): 25 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||