![]() |
|
|
Vol. 289, Issue 3, 1220-1228, June 1999
Departments of Psychiatry (A.C., A.M.P., E.E.E-F.),
Neuroscience (E.E.E-F.), and Pharmacology (E.E.E-F.), University of
Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Previous findings in our laboratory suggested that the M1
muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) agonist xanomeline exhibits a
novel mode of interaction that involves persistent binding to and
activation of the M1 mAChR, subsequent to extensive
washout, as well as a possible insurmountable element. In the present
study, we examined this interaction in greater detail, using Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with the genes for the M1
mAChR and neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Pretreatment of cells with xanomeline, followed by extensive washout, resulted in elevated basal
levels of neuronal nitric oxide synthase activity that were suppressed
by the antagonists atropine or pirenzepine in a concentration-dependent manner. Analysis of the data yielded estimates of Schild slope factors
and pKB values for the antagonists that were
consistent with a model of simple competition between these latter
agents and the persistently bound form of xanomeline. The ability of the antagonists to produce parallel dextral shifts of the
concentration-response curves to carbachol and xanomeline was also
investigated. The interaction between xanomeline and pirenzepine
appeared to be insurmountable, but this may have been due to an
equilibrium artifact. In contrast, the interaction between xanomeline
and atropine conformed to a model of competition, indicating that the
mode of interaction of free xanomeline at the M1 mAChR is
pharmacologically identical with that of the persistently bound form.
Radioligand binding studies also showed that the presence of various
concentrations of xanomeline had no significant effect on the
calculated affinity of atropine or pirenzepine in inhibiting the
binding of [3H]N-methylscopolamine.
Overall, these findings suggest that the persistent attachment of
xanomeline to the M1 mAChR does not prevent this agonist
from interacting with the classic binding site in a competitive fashion.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Machova, J. Jakubik, E. E. El-Fakahany, and V. Dolezal Wash-Resistantly Bound Xanomeline Inhibits Acetylcholine Release by Persistent Activation of Presynaptic M2 and M4 Muscarinic Receptors in Rat Brain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 316 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jakubik, E. E. El-Fakahany, and V. Dolezal Differences in Kinetics of Xanomeline Binding and Selectivity of Activation of G Proteins at M1 and M2 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2006; 70(2): 656 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. O. Grant and E. E. El-Fakahany Persistent Binding and Functional Antagonism by Xanomeline at the Muscarinic M5 Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2005; 315(1): 313 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jakubik, S. Tucek, and E. E. El-Fakahany Role of Receptor Protein and Membrane Lipids in Xanomeline Wash-Resistant Binding to Muscarinic M1 Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2004; 308(1): 105 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Jakubik, S. Tucek, and E. E. El-Fakahany Allosteric Modulation by Persistent Binding of Xanomeline of the Interaction of Competitive Ligands with the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2002; 301(3): 1033 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Lyon, J. S. Wright, A. Christopoulos, R. P. Novick, and T. W. Muir Reversible and Specific Extracellular Antagonism of Receptor-Histidine Kinase Signaling J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2002; 277(8): 6247 - 6253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Christopoulos, M. K. O. Grant, N. Ayoubzadeh, O. N. Kim, P. Sauerberg, L. Jeppesen, and E. E. El-Fakahany Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Dimeric Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2001; 298(3): 1260 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||