JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clement, R.
Right arrow Articles by Verge, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clement, R.
Right arrow Articles by Verge, R. L.

Vol. 289, Issue 2, 1015-1021, May 1999

Cerebrospinal Fluid Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine after Intrathecal and Epidural Administrations in Rabbits Using Microdialysis

Rozenn Clement, Jean-Marc Malinovsky, Pascal Le Corre, Gilles Dollo, Francois Chevanne and Roger Le Verge

Laboratoire de Pharmacie Galénique et Biopharmacie, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université de Rennes, Rennes Cedex, France

The aim of this work was to study the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine (BUP) and lidocaine (LID) administered separately in rabbits using microdialysis with retrodialysis calibration. Microdialysis probe and catheters were inserted under control of the view in the intrathecal or epidural spaces. The epidural disposition of BUP and LID after epidural administration of low (0.69 µM) and high (6.9 µM) doses was studied. Then, the intrathecal and plasma dispositions after separate intrathecal (0.2 µM) and epidural administration (6.9 µM) were investigated. The CSF binding of BUP and LID was linear in a range from 50 to 500 µg/ml, and the mean unbound CSF fraction at a concentration of 100 µg/ml was 39.3 ± 2.3% for BUP and 75.8 ± 7.7% for LID. Epidural and intrathecal disposition of BUP and LID showed a biexponential decline. After epidural administration, the CSF concentrations of BUP and LID were much higher than those in plasma. After intrathecal administration, the plasma concentrations were below the limit of quantitation. Although the absorption rate of BUP appeared higher than that of LID, the mean CSF bioavailability of epidural BUP and LID was 5.5 and 17.7%, respectively. The unexpectedly higher CSF bioavailability of LID, the less lipophilic drug, may result from the difference in the processes competing for drug epidural removal.


0022-3565/99/2892-1015$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S.-J. Lee, S.-J. Bai, J.-S. Lee, W.-O. Kim, Y.-S. Shin, and K.-Y. Lee
The Duration of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Mixed with Lidocaine
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 824 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Ratajczak-Enselme, J.-P. Estebe, F.-X. Rose, E. Wodey, J.-M. Malinovsky, F. Chevanne, G. Dollo, C. Ecoffey, and P. Le Corre
Effect of epinephrine on epidural, intrathecal, and plasma pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2007; 99(6): 881 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F.-X. Rose, J.-P. Estebe, M. Ratajczak, E. Wodey, F. Chevanne, G. Dollo, D. Bec, J.-M. Malinovsky, C. Ecoffey, and P. Le Corre
Epidural, Intrathecal Pharmacokinetics, and Intrathecal Bioavailability of Ropivacaine
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 859 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.