JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mealing, G. A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morley, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mealing, G. A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morley, P.

Vol. 288, Issue 1, 204-210, January 1999

Differences in Degree of Trapping of Low-Affinity Uncompetitive N-Methyl-D-aspartic Acid Receptor Antagonists with Similar Kinetics of Block1

G. A. R. Mealing, T. H. Lanthorn2, C. L. Murray, D. L. Small and P. Morley

Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada,

This study characterizes the trapping of block of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-induced currents by three structurally distinct, use-dependent NMDA receptor antagonists with similar rapid on-off rates. The antagonism of whole-cell currents in cultured rat cortical neurons by AR-R15896AR, ketamine, and memantine was examined. All three compounds produced a steady-state block after a 30-s coapplication, which was fully relieved after 50 s of NMDA exposure. The amplitudes of block caused by 50 µM AR-R15896AR, 10 µM ketamine, or 10 µM memantine were not significantly different, being 82 ± 1%, 80 ± 2%, and 81 ± 2%, respectively. All three NMDA receptor antagonists exhibited trapping of block that was not significantly increased by extending the agonist/antagonist coapplication beyond 30 s. Although the initial blocks were similar, after 120 s of washout without agonist present, there were significant differences in trapping of block between antagonists, as only 54 ± 3% of the AR-R15896AR block, 86 ± 1% of the ketamine block, and 71 ± 4% of the memantine block remained trapped. The lack of complete trapping is consistent with closed-channel egress by these compounds. Higher antagonist concentrations produced larger initial blocks, but the degree of trapping block was not significantly different from that at lower antagonist concentrations. The results demonstrate that differences in the degree of trapping exist among use-dependent NMDA receptor antagonists even when on and off rates are similar. These differences are correlated with measures of therapeutic index.


0022-3565/99/2881-0204$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
G. A. R. Mealing, T. H. Lanthorn, D. L. Small, R. J. Murray, K. C. Mattes, T. M. Comas, and P. Morley
Structural Modifications to an N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Antagonist Result in Large Differences in Trapping Block
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2001; 297(3): 906 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Li, G. A. R. Mealing, P. Morley, and P. K. Stys
Novel Injury Mechanism in Anoxia and Trauma of Spinal Cord White Matter: Glutamate Release via Reverse Na+-dependent Glutamate Transport
J. Neurosci., July 15, 1999; 19(14): RC16 - RC16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.