![]() |
|
|
Vol. 286, Issue 3, 1333-1340, September 1998
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Western
Ontario (T.B., S.L., P.J.F., J.R.H.) and the
London Regional Cancer
Centre (P.J.F.), London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C1
The uptake of [3H]formycin B by Ehrlich ascites tumor
cells was examined in both normal Na+ buffer
(physiological) and nominally Na+-free buffer (iso-osmotic
replacement with Li+). These studies were conducted to
further characterize the equilibrative nucleoside transporter subtypes
of Ehrlich cells and to assess the contribution of
Na+-dependent concentrative transport mechanisms to the
cellular accumulation of nucleoside analogues by these cells. Formycin B is poorly metabolized by mammalian cells and, hence, can be used as a
substrate to measure transport kinetics in energetically competent
cells. Initial studies established that formycin B inhibited [3H]uridine uptake by the ei (equilibrative
inhibitor-insensitive) and es (equilibrative
inhibitor-sensitive) transporters of Ehrlich cells with
Ki values of 48 ± 28 and 277 ± 25 µM, respectively. Similarly, [3H]formycin B had
Km values of 111 ± 52 and 635 ± 147 µM for uptake by the ei and es transporters,
respectively. When assays were conducted in the presence of
Na+, plus 100 nM nitrobenzylthioinosine to prevent efflux
via the es transporters, the intracellular concentration of
[3H]formycin B exceeded the initial medium concentration
by more than 3-fold, indicating the activity of a
Na+-dependent transporter. Interestingly, the initial rate
of uptake of [3H]formycin B was significantly higher in
the Li+ buffer (es-mediated Vmax = 65 ± 10 pmol/µl · sec) than in the Na+
buffer (Vmax = 8.4 ± 0.9 pmol/µl · sec);
this may reflect trans-acceleration of [3H]formycin B
uptake by elevated intracellular adenosine levels resulting from the
low Na+ environment. This model was then used to assess the
interaction of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) with the
equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters. Gemcitabine,
which has shown considerable potential for the treatment of solid
tumors, was a relatively poor inhibitor of [3H]formycin B
uptake via the equilibrative transporters (IC50 ~ 400 µM). In contrast, gemcitabine was a potent inhibitor of the Na+-dependent nucleoside transporter of Ehrlich cells
(IC50 = 17 ± 5 nM). These results suggest that the
cellular expression/activity of Na+-dependent nucleoside
transporters may be an important determinant in gemcitabine
cytotoxicity and clinical efficacy.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Govindarajan, C. J. Endres, D. Whittington, E. LeCluyse, M. Pastor-Anglada, C.-M. Tse, and J. D. Unadkat Expression and hepatobiliary transport characteristics of the concentrative and equilibrative nucleoside transporters in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): G570 - G580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Hammond and R. G. E. Archer Interaction of the Novel Adenosine Uptake Inhibitor 3-[1-(6,7-Diethoxy-2-morpholinoquinazolin-4-yl)piperidin-4-yl]-1,6-dimethyl-2,4(1H,3H)-quinazolinedione Hydrochloride (KF24345) with the es and ei Subtypes of Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2004; 308(3): 1083 - 1093. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Blackstock, H. Lightfoot, L. D. Case, J. E. Tepper, S. K. Mukherji, B. S. Mitchell, S. G. Swarts, and S. M. Hess Tumor Uptake and Elimination of 2',2'-Difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (Gemcitabine) after Deoxycytidine Kinase Gene Transfer: Correlation with in Vivo Tumor Response Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 3263 - 3268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Rauchwerger, P. S. Firby, D. W. Hedley, and M. J. Moore Equilibrative-Sensitive Nucleoside Transporter and Its Role in Gemcitabine Sensitivity Cancer Res., November 1, 2000; 60(21): 6075 - 6079. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Hammond, S. Lee, and P. J. Ferguson [3H]Gemcitabine Uptake by Nucleoside Transporters in a Human Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma Cell Line J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1999; 288(3): 1185 - 1191. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||