JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bot, G.
Right arrow Articles by Reisine, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bot, G.
Right arrow Articles by Reisine, T.

Vol. 285, Issue 3, 1207-1218, June 1998

Fentanyl and its Analogs Desensitize the Cloned Mu Opioid Receptor1

George Bot, Allan D. Blake, Shuixing Li and Terry Reisine

Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Fentanyl, and its structural analogs lofentanil and sufentanil, are potent analgesics used clinically in the management of pain. However, the high analgesic potency of these compounds is limited by the development of tolerance after chronic use. To investigate whether their tolerance development may be related to mu receptor desensitization, the cloned mouse mu receptor as well as mutant forms of the receptor were stably expressed in HEK 293 cells and tested for their response to continuous opioid treatment. Fentanyl and its analogs potently bound to the mu receptor and effectively inhibited cAMP accumulation. Three-hour pretreatment of mu receptors with fentanyl and its analogs desensitized the mu receptor by uncoupling it from adenylyl cyclase. The fentanyl analogs caused a slight internalization of the mu receptor as accessed by antibody binding to the epitope-tagged mu receptor. Truncation of the mu receptor by removal of its carboxyl terminus at Glu341 did not affect the ability of the fentanyl analogs to bind to and activate the mu receptor nor did it prevent the fentanyl analogs from desensitizing the receptor. In a previous study we showed that morphine did not desensitize the cloned mu receptor even though it is a potent and effective agonist at the mu receptor. Mutagenesis studies revealed that morphine interacts differently with the mu receptor to activate it than do the fentanyl analogs which may explain its lack of desensitization of the mu receptor. These results indicate that desensitization of the mu receptor may be a molecular basis for the development of tolerance to fentanyl and its analogs.


0022-3565/98/2853-1207$03.00/0
THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
Copyright © 1998 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.