![]() |
|
|
Vol. 285, Issue 1, 135-142, April 1998
Department of Pharmacology, Merck Research Laboratories, West
Point, Pennsylvania
The atrial versus ventricular activities of Class III
agents with differing K+ channel blocking profiles were
assessed in vitro in ferret atrial and right ventricular
papillary muscles. In concentration-effective refractory period (ERP)
response studies at 2 Hz and 32°C, the selective IKr
blockers dofetilide, E-4031 and d-sotalol, as well as
ibutilide, an IKr blocker also reported to enhance inward
Na+ current, displayed markedly greater efficacies in
increasing atrial ERP (+90-110%) versus ventricular
ERP (+10-20%). RP58866, a blocker of IK1 and
IKr, and tedisamil, primarily a blocker of Ito
and IKr, increased atrial ERP with approximately 10-fold
greater potencies than ventricular ERP, but with similar efficacies for both tissues (+60-80% with RP58866; +150-160% with tedisamil). Azimilide, a blocker of IKr and IKs, and
indapamide, a blocker of IKs, displayed essentially
"balanced" activities, increasing atrial and ventricular ERP with
equivalent potencies and efficacies (+40-60% increases for both
tissues). Frequency-dependence profiles at 32°C varied between atrial
and ventricular tissues, and there was no general correspondence
between atrial versus ventricular selectivity and
frequency-dependence profiles. In the papillary muscle preparation,
increasing temperature from 32°C to 37°C altered both magnitude and
frequency dependence of response to K+ channel blockers.
These findings support the potential to selectively modulate atrial
versus ventricular refractoriness with the targeting of
appropriate K+ channel subtypes, and further demonstrate
the differential frequency and temperature dependence of varying
K+ channel subtype blockade. Ultimately, the identification
and targeting of an appropriate K+ channel subtype or mix
of subtypes may result in the achievement of optimal atrial-selective
activity for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Fragakis, A. Bikias, I. Delithanasis, M. Konstantinidou, N. Liakopoulos, M. Kozirakis, and G. Katsaris Acute beta-adrenoceptor blockade improves efficacy of ibutilide in conversion of atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular rate Europace, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 70 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Hohnloser, P. Dorian, M. Straub, K. Beckmann, and P. Kowey Safety and efficacy of intravenously administered tedisamil for rapid conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 99 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. N. Singh Atrial Fibrillation: Epidemiologic Considerations and Rationale for Conversion and Maintenance of Sinus Rhythm Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2003; 8(1_suppl): S13 - S26. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dorian Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation: Focus on New Agents Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2003; 8(1_suppl): S27 - S31. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Glatter, P. C. Dorostkar, Y. Yang, R. J. Lee, G. F. Van Hare, E. Keung, G. Modin, and M. M. Scheinman Electrophysiological Effects of Ibutilide in Patients With Accessory Pathways Circulation, October 16, 2001; 104(16): 1933 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Mounsey and J. P. DiMarco Dofetilide Circulation, November 21, 2000; 102(21): 2665 - 2670. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D Walker, C. B Singleton, H. Tie, J. A Bursill, K. R Wyse, S. M Valenzuela, S. N Breit, and T. J Campbell Comparative effects of azimilide and ambasilide on the human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) potassium channel Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2000; 48(1): 44 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dorian and D. Newman Rate dependence of the effect of antiarrhythmic drugs delaying cardiac repolarization: an overview Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(4): 277 - 285. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||