JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bauco, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bauco, P.
Right arrow Articles by Wise, R. A.

Vol. 283, Issue 3, 1160-1167, 1997

Synergistic Effects of Cocaine with Lateral Hypothalamic Brain Stimulation Reward: Lack of Tolerance or Sensitization1

Pat Bauco and Roy A. Wise

Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology and Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

The curve-shift (rate-frequency) paradigm was used to quantify the interaction of cocaine administration with the rewarding effects of lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation. First, eight animals were tested at 48-h intervals with increasing doses of cocaine (0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 or 32 mg/kg i.p.); tests with saline were given on intervening days. Cocaine produced dose-orderly leftward shifts of the functions relating response rate to stimulation frequency, which reduced, for each animal, the amount of stimulation required to sustain responding; the two highest doses of the drug shifted the mean rate-frequency curve by 0.47 log units, more than doubling the rewarding potency of the brain stimulation. Baseline thresholds did not change between tests. Next, evidence for sensitization or tolerance was sought from five additional groups of animals, one group given 4 mg/kg and two groups given 16 mg/kg of cocaine at 48-h intervals, and another two groups maintained for 7 days with thrice-daily injections of 10 mg/kg of cocaine or saline. Consistent with results seen in other brain stimulation reward paradigms, there was no evidence of tolerance or sensitization to cocaine's reward-potentiating effects as quantified in the rate-frequency paradigm.


0022-3565/97/2833-1160$03.00/0
Copyright © 1997 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Levy, M. Shabat-Simon, U. Shalev, N. Barnea-Ygael, A. Cooper, and A. Zangen
Repeated Electrical Stimulation of Reward-Related Brain Regions Affects Cocaine But Not "Natural" Reinforcement
J. Neurosci., December 19, 2007; 27(51): 14179 - 14189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. R. Vorel, C. R. Ashby Jr, M. Paul, X. Liu, R. Hayes, J. J. Hagan, D. N. Middlemiss, G. Stemp, and E. L. Gardner
Dopamine D3 Receptor Antagonism Inhibits Cocaine-Seeking and Cocaine-Enhanced Brain Reward in Rats
J. Neurosci., November 1, 2002; 22(21): 9595 - 9603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
J. M. van Ree, M. A. F. M. Gerrits, and L. J. M. J. Vanderschuren
Opioids, Reward and Addiction: An Encounter of Biology, Psychology, and Medicine
Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 1999; 51(2): 341 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Cabeza de Vaca and K. D. Carr
Food Restriction Enhances the Central Rewarding Effect of Abused Drugs
J. Neurosci., September 15, 1998; 18(18): 7502 - 7510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.