![]() |
|
|
Vol. 283, Issue 3, 1119-1129, 1997
Department of Psychology, Busch Campus, Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, New Jersey (C.E.L.) and
Center for Bioengineering,
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (A.C.H.)
Alprazolam decreased the reinforcement rate and increased the
shorter-response rate of contingency-controlled timing behavior under a
differential reinforcement of low-rate schedule (DRL 45-s) in rats. An
integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model was developed
to describe and characterize the effects of i.v. and s.c.
administration of alprazolam. The onset, peak and disappearance of
alprazolam effects were evaluated during a 3-hr session. After s.c.
alprazolam administration, two peak increases in shorter-response rate
occurred at moderate alprazolam serum levels, first in the ascending
and then in the descending limb of the concentration-time profile. We
used a stimulation-sedation PD model incorporating two opposing
effect-link sigmoidal Emax functions to model the two
peaks after s.c. alprazolam administration. The model suggested that
alprazolam possesses both stimulatory and sedative effects in a
continuous but sequential fashion, which corresponded to low- and
high-concentration effects as indicated by the EC50 values of 0.09 and
0.18 µg/ml, respectively. Owing to the rapid onset of i.v.
administration, the first peak (a transition phase before the onset of
the sedative effect) was absent, with the presence of the second peak
again coinciding with the offset of the sedative effect. The
reinforcement rate (IC50 = 0.02 µg/ml) characterized by the
indirect response model to account for the initial hysteresis is an
index for evaluating the deficit in timing performance. Although the
effects of alprazolam can be described in behavioral terms,
simultaneous PK-PD optimization numerically defines the performance and
hypothesizes the coexistence of stimulation and sedation components for
alprazolam. The stimulation-sedation model may help in delineating the
possible mechanisms for adverse rebound side effects and of tolerance
in humans.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Venkatakrishnan, K. E. Culm, B. L. Ehrenberg, J. S. Harmatz, K. E. Corbett, J. C. Fleishaker, and D. J. Greenblatt Kinetics and Dynamics of Intravenous Adinazolam, N-Desmethyl Adinazolam, and Alprazolam in Healthy Volunteers J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2005; 45(5): 529 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Lau, L. Sun, Q. Wang, A. Simpao, and J. L. Falk Oral Cocaine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in a Cumulative-Dose Regimen: Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Concurrent Operant and Spontaneous Behavior within an Operant Context J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2000; 295(2): 634 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, A. Roy, L. Sun, and C. E. Lau Short Communication: A Double-Peak Phenomenon in the Pharmacokinetics of Alprazolam after Oral Administration Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 1999; 27(8): 855 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Lau, F. Ma, D. M. Foster, and J. L. Falk Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Psychomotor Stimulant Effect of Cocaine after Intravenous Administration: Timing Performance Deficits J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 1999; 288(2): 535 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||