![]() |
|
|
Vol. 283, Issue 2, 704-711, 1997
-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor in Rat
Is Increased by Chronic Treatment with Chlordiazepoxide: A Molecular
Mechanism of Dependence1
Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of
Missouri, Columbia, Missouri (D.J.C., P.S.) and
Department of
Pharmacology, Health Sciences Center, University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque, New Mexico (A.M.A.)
When rats were made tolerant to the benzodiazepine tranquilizer
chlordiazepoxide (CDPX) by its steady administration, a particular
-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor in cerebral
cortex was modified. Its rate of desensitization in the absence of CDPX was enhanced (3-fold with 10 µM GABA) below saturation with GABA, and
the dependence of this rate on GABA concentration was changed from
sigmoid to hyperbolic. This mimicked the effect of the presence of CDPX
on desensitization of the naive receptor. This receptor has been
characterized by its rapid desensitization
(t1/2 = 30 msec at saturation). In contrast,
a different, slower desensitizing GABAA receptor, on the
same membrane, was unaffected, and the initial transmembrane halide
exchange rate of the faster desensitizing receptor was unaltered. In
the presence of CDPX, the initial halide exchange rate of the modified
receptor was enhanced, but the already enhanced desensitization rate
was not altered. During chronic presence of CDPX and the development of
tolerance, the total signal due to this receptor remained constant at
the value before exposure. After discontinuation, the total signal
decreased but could be restored to the original value by the presence
of CDPX. It was postulated that dependence and withdrawal syndromes
result from a decreased ratio of initial chloride flux rate to
desensitization rate, caused by an increase in desensitization. The
contribution of this effect in vivo would depend on
desensitization making a contribution to signal termination [or the
fraction of receptors that are inactive (desensitized)]. In the quench
flow experiments, the total signal due to this receptor from naive rat
did not depend much on GABA concentration or the presence of CDPX
because the result of increased channel opening was counterbalanced by
increased desensitization. In contrast, the total signal of this
receptor from tolerant rat was significantly increased by CDPX or
increased GABA concentration. Differences between these experiments and measurements reported with other drugs could be explained if, in those
experiments, the halide exchange rate, as well as its desensitization
rate, retained an enhanced value in the absence of the drug.