JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Peers, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Peers, C.

Vol. 281, Issue 3, 1257-1263, 1997

Regulation of [Ca++]i in Human Neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) Cells Expressing Recombinant Rat Angiotensin1A Receptors by Angiotensin II and Carbachol1

R. L. McDonald, D. J. Roberts, A. C. V. Palmer, S. G. Ball, P. F. T. Vaughan and C. Peers

Institute for Cardiovascular Research, Leeds University, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.

The ability of angiotensin II (AII) to regulate [Ca++]i in human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells stably expressing recombinant rat AT1A receptors was investigated using microfluorimetric methods, and compared to responses obtained by stimulation of native muscarinic receptors. Applications of AII or carbachol produced biphasic rises of [Ca++]i, but in Ca++-free solutions (containing 1 mM ethylene glycol-bis (beta -aminoethyl ether)N,N,N,'N'-tetraacetic acid), both agonists produced only transient monophasic rises of [Ca++]i, and second applications were without effect. Application of Ca++o (2.5 mM) to cells after exposure to either agonist produced a Ni2+-sensitive rise of [Ca++]i in the absence of agonist ("capacitative Ca++ influx"). After removal of Ca++o, both AII and carbachol elicited a second rise of [Ca++]i. Thapsigargin (1 µM) prevented these second rises of [Ca++]i. During capacitative Ca++ influx, application of AII failed to produce a further rise of [Ca++]i. In contrast, carbachol produced a further rise of [Ca++]i, attributable to activation of both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, because it was reduced (but not abolished) by mecamylamine (1 µM) and was observed when muscarine was used as the agonist. Thus, activation of recombinant AT1A and muscarinic receptors in SH-SY5Y cells leads to mobilization of Ca++ from a common intracellular pool, and stimulates capacitative Ca++ influx. Muscarinic (but not AII) receptor occupancy is capable of stimulating an additional Ca++ influx pathway.


Copyright © by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.