![]() |
|
|
Vol. 281, Issue 3, 1164-1170, 1997
Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie der
Universität des Saarlandes, D-66424 Homburg/Saar, Germany (I.J.,
W.K., J.B.), and
Mundipharma GmbH, D-65549 Limburg/Lahn, Germany (W.F.)
Dihydrocodeine is increasingly used in slow-release preparations for
the treatment of chronic pain on step 2 of the "analgesic ladder"
of the World Health Organization. Dihydrocodeine is suggested to act
after O-demethylation to dihydromorphine. To test this possibility,
experiments were carried out on rats under urethane anesthesia in which
nociceptive activity was evoked by electrical stimulation of afferent C
fibers in the sural nerve and recorded from neurons in the ventrobasal
complex of the thalamus. Dihydrocodeine administered by intravenous
injection reduced the evoked nociceptive activity in a dose-dependent
manner. Like morphine, dihydrocodeine was capable of completely
suppressing the evoked activity. Maximum depression was caused by 2 mg/kg, and the ED50 is 0.47 mg/kg. Naloxone (0.2 mg/kg)
reversed the effect of dihydrocodeine (2 mg/kg). To inhibit
O-demethylation of dihydrocodeine to dihydromorphine, metyrapone or
cimetidine (50 mg/kg) was injected intraperitoneally 20 min before
dihydrocodeine (1 and 2 mg/kg). This failed to markedly reduce the
effect of dihydrocodeine. Dihydromorphine injected intravenously also
reduced the evoked activity in a dose-dependent way. Maximum depression
occurred at a dose of 4 mg/kg, and the ED50 is 0.97 mg/kg.
Dihydrocodeine and dihydromorphine were equieffective when administered
by intrathecal injection at a dose of 100 µg. It is concluded that
dihydrocodeine causes analgesia independent of biotransformation to
dihydromorphine.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Thompson, H. Wojno, E. Greiner, E. L. May, K. C. Rice, and D. E. Selley Activation of G-Proteins by Morphine and Codeine Congeners: Insights to the Relevance of O- and N-Demethylated Metabolites at {micro}- and {delta}-Opioid Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2004; 308(2): 547 - 554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||