![]() |
|
|
Vol. 281, Issue 2, 928-940, 1997
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology and the Institute for
Neurosciences, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago,
Illinois
The effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade on
two major variants of rabbit eyeblink conditioning were evaluated using
a selective noncompetitive antagonist, [5R,
10S]-[+]-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a, d]
cyclo-hepten-5,10-imine hydrogen maleate; dizocilpine (MK-801) or
phencyclidine (PCP), a drug of abuse. Either MK-801 or PCP (given
daily) impaired rabbits' ability to associate tone conditioned stimuli
with airpuff unconditioned stimuli, with the severity of impairment
exhibiting clear dose and task dependencies. Trace-conditioned rabbits
given
80 µg/kg of MK-801 or
1.0 mg/kg of PCP failed to
reach a criterion of 80% conditioned responses during training, with
significant impairments seen at intermediate doses. Delay-conditioned rabbits, although dose-dependently slowed, successfully acquired the
task, even when given doses of MK-801 or PCP that completely blocked
acquisition in trace conditioning. Additionally, even low doses of
MK-801 (10 µg/kg) or of PCP (0.1 mg/kg) severely altered conditioned
response timing in trace but not in delay conditioning, resembling
effects observed after hippocampal lesions. Doses of MK-801 or PCP that
impaired acquisition also severely impaired extinction of both trace-
and delay-conditioned eyeblink responses. However, neither MK-801 nor
PCP altered retention or timing of previously learned responses. Higher
doses of MK-801 (
200 µg/kg) or of PCP (
2.0 mg/kg)
dose-dependently impaired unconditioned response performance, although
lower doses of MK-801 (
160 µg/kg) or of PCP (
1.0 mg/kg) had no
effects on unconditioned responses or on nonassociative
pseudoconditioned responses. The deficits observed indicate that
although not necessary for retention, N-methyl-D-aspartate
receptor activation may facilitate acquisition of delay-conditioning.
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation appears to be
necessary for acquisition of trace conditioning, and for extinction in
either paradigm.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bespalov, A.-L. Jongen-Relo, M. van Gaalen, S. Harich, H. Schoemaker, and G. Gross Habituation Deficits Induced by Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors 2/3 Receptor Blockade in Mice: Reversal by Antipsychotic Drugs J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2007; 320(2): 944 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kishimoto, K. Nakazawa, S. Tonegawa, Y. Kirino, and M. Kano Hippocampal CA3 NMDA Receptors Are Crucial for Adaptive Timing of Trace Eyeblink Conditioned Response J. Neurosci., February 1, 2006; 26(5): 1562 - 1570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takehara-Nishiuchi, S. Kawahara, and Y. Kirino NMDA receptor-dependent processes in the medial prefrontal cortex are important for acquisition and the early stage of consolidation during trace, but not delay eyeblink conditioning Learn. Mem., November 1, 2005; 12(6): 606 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Wu, C. S. Chan, and J. F. Disterhoft Slow Afterhyperpolarization Governs the Development of NMDA Receptor-Dependent Afterdepolarization in CA1 Pyramidal Neurons During Synaptic Stimulation J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2004; 92(4): 2346 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Robleto, A. M. Poulos, and R. F. Thompson Brain Mechanisms of Extinction of the Classically Conditioned Eyeblink Response Learn. Mem., September 1, 2004; 11(5): 517 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Christian and R. F. Thompson Neural Substrates of Eyeblink Conditioning: Acquisition and Retention Learn. Mem., November 1, 2003; 10(6): 427 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Leuner, J. Falduto, and T. J. Shors Associative Memory Formation Increases the Observation of Dendritic Spines in the Hippocampus J. Neurosci., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 659 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||