![]() |
|
|
Vol. 281, Issue 2, 707-712, 1997
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics, The University of
Illinois at Chicago Health Sciences Center, Chicago, Illinois
The effects of twice-daily injections of L-arginine or
D-arginine (200 mg/kg i.p.) for 4 days on morphine-induced
antinociception, brain nitric oxide synthase activity and brain and
serum distribution of morphine and brain µ-opioid receptors labeled
with
[3H][D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin
were determined in male Swiss-Webster mice. Chronic treatment with
L-arginine, but not D-arginine, decreased the
antinociceptive response to morphine in mice, increased the activity of
nitric oxide synthase in the midbrain and decreased brain levels of
morphine, compared with vehicle-injected controls. Significant
decreases in morphine levels were observed in midbrain, pons and
medulla, hippocampus, striatum and spinal cord of
L-arginine-treated mice, in comparison with
vehicle-injected mice. However, the levels of morphine in cortex,
amygdala and hypothalamus of L-arginine- or
D-arginine-treated mice did not differ from those of
vehicle-injected controls. Acute treatment with L-arginine
(200 mg/kg i.p.) or D-arginine (200 mg/kg i.p.) did not
modify either morphine antinociception or morphine distribution in
brain regions or the spinal cord. Chronic administration of
L-arginine or D-arginine did not alter the
Bmax or Kd values
of
[3H][D-Ala2,MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin
binding to the mouse brain membranes. These results suggest that
chronic treatment with L-arginine reduces the
antinociceptive effect of morphine by increasing brain nitric oxide
synthase activity and by decreasing the concentration of morphine in
certain brain regions and spinal cord.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G.-M. Zhao, D. Wu, Y. Soong, M. Shimoyama, I. Berezowska, P. W. Schiller, and H. H. Szeto Profound Spinal Tolerance after Repeated Exposure to a Highly Selective {micro}-Opioid Peptide Agonist: Role of delta -Opioid Receptors J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2002; 302(1): 188 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||