JPET Celsis microsomes equal better data

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prete, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Graziani, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prete, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Graziani, G.

Drug-induced changes of carcinoembryonic antigen expression in human cancer cells: effect of 5-fluorouracil

SP Prete, A Aquino, G Masci, L Orlando, A Giuliani, S De Santis, L De Vecchis, R De Filippi, JW Greiner, E Bonmassar and G Graziani

Department of Experimental Medicine and Biochemical Sciences, University of Rome, Tor Vergata, Italy.

Previous studies showed that 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is capable of enhancing the membrane reactivity of the human colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 with a monoclonal antibody (COL-1) directed against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). In the present study, we show that short-term exposure (i.e., 1 hr) of cancer cells to 5-FU mediates a marked increase of CEA expression, that is concentration-dependent and lasts up to day 5 after treatment. This phenomenon is the result of the drug-mediated enhancement of the CEA expression, but not of the selection of the CEA-positive cells operated by the antimetabolite. This is supported by the finding that the increase of the CEA expression detected by cytofluorimetric analysis is observed not only in the parental HT-29 line, but also in its C22.20 subclone, endowed with a low basal level of CEA and with chemosensitivity to 5-FU lower than that of the parental cell line. Moreover, increase of CEA expression occurs not only in the plasma membrane, but also in the cytosolic cellular compartment, as indicated by the results of Western blot analysis. Northern blot analysis of total RNA extracted from 5-FU- treated HT-29 or C22.20 cells shows an increase in the steady-state levels of CEA and CEA-related transcripts (e.g., biliary glycoprotein). Moreover 5-FU-mediated augmentation of the CEA transcript appears to be attributable mainly to enhanced transcription rather than to increased mRNA stability. It is concluded that induction of enhanced CEA protein expression in cancer cells treated with 5-FU could be of clinical interest for the development of immunochemotherapeutic protocols based on CEA protein as the target molecule.

Volume 279, Issue 3, pp. 1574-1581, 12/01/1996
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.