JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abiko, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Abiko, Y.

Dilazep and its derivative, K-7259, attenuate mechanical derangement induced by palmitoyl-L-carnitine in the isolated, perfused rat heart

A Hara, H Hashizume and Y Abiko

Department of Pharmacology, Asahikawa Medical College, Japan.

The effect of dilazep, a potentiator of the adenosine-mediated effects, on the palmitoyl-L-carnitine (PALCAR)-induced mechanical derangement was studied in the isolated rat heart and compared with that of K-7259, a dilazep derivative having less potentiating action on the adenosine- mediated effects. The heart was perfused aerobically by the Langendorff's technique at a constant flow and driven electrically. PALCAR (5 microM) decreased the left ventricular developed pressure and increased the left ventricular end diastolic pressure in the heart (i.e., mechanical dysfunction). These mechanical alterations induced by PALCAR were attenuated by dilazep (1 microM) and K-7259 (1 microM). In contrast, adenosine (10 or 100 microM) did not attenuate the PALCAR- induced mechanical derangement. On the other hand, neither dilazep nor K-7259 modified the mechanical function of the normal (PALCAR- untreated) heart. These results suggest that dilazep and K-7259 attenuate the PALCAR-induced mechanical derangement and that the protective action of both drugs is not due to potentiation of adenosine- mediated effects.

Volume 279, Issue 1, pp. 32-38, 10/01/1996
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.