JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mertz, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mertz, T. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gallagher, K. P.

Endothelin A receptor antagonism by PD 156707 does not reduce infarct size after coronary artery occlusion/reperfusion in pigs

TE Mertz, TB McClanahan, MA Flynn, P Juneau, EE Reynolds, H Hallak, L Bradford and KP Gallagher

Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Episodes of myocardial ischemia are associated with increases in cardiac venous plasma endothelin (ET) concentrations, suggesting that ET may play a role in the development of myocardial infarction. The purpose of this study was to determine if selective blockade of ET(A) receptors by PD 156707 reduces infarct size caused by coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion in pentobarbital-anesthetized micropigs. A PD 156707 dose which selectively blocks the ET(A)-mediated vasopressor response, but not the ET(B)-mediated vasodepressor response to i.v. ET- 1 challenges (0.3 nmol/kg), was established in dose ranging studies in anesthetized micropigs. In myocardial infarction studies, micropigs received either saline vehicle (n = 7) or PD 156707 (n = 8) at a loading dose of 10 mg/kg/1 hr, followed by a maintenance dose of 7 mg/kg/hr. Coinciding with the start of the maintenance dose, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 1 hr followed by 3 hr of reperfusion. PD 156707 caused a significant (29 mm Hg) decrease in arterial blood pressure before occlusion. PD 156707 had no effect on infarct size (61.1 +/- 5.6% of the region at risk in the PD 156707 treatment group vs. 70.1 +/- 3.9% in the control group). These results suggest that ET(A) receptor activation does not substantially contribute to coronary artery occlusion/reperfusion-induced myocardial infarction.

Volume 278, Issue 1, pp. 42-49, 07/01/1996
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
I. A. Khan
Role of Endothelin-1 in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1474 - 1476.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.