JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nomura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nomura, K.
Right arrow Articles by Yamaguchi, I.

Different mechanisms mediated by dopamine D1 and D2 receptors are involved etiologically in activity-stress gastric lesion of the rat

K Nomura, N Maeda, T Yoshino and I Yamaguchi

Basic Research Group, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan.

Rats subjected to activity-stress developed gastric lesions and showed excessive running activity with an increase of light/dark ratio. Daily treatment with centrally acting dopamine antagonists, SCH23390 [(R)-(+)- 8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3- benzazepin-7-ol] (0.1-10 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1-10 mg/kg), sulpiride (32-320 mg/kg), clozapine (1-100 mg/kg) and metoclopramide (1-100 mg/kg) suppressed the lesion formation: ID50 values were 0.9, 0.4, 53, 8.9 and 60 mg/kg, respectively. On the other hand, domperidone (1-100 mg/kg), a peripherally acting dopamine antagonist, failed to suppress the lesion formation and FR64822 [N-(4-pyridylcarbamoyl)amino 1,2,3,6- tetrahydropyridine] (1-32 mg/kg), a central dopamine enhancer, aggravated it. The excessive running activity was reversed dose- dependently by treatment with haloperidol, a specific dopamine D2 antagonist, but not by SCH23390, a specific dopamine D1 antagonist. Conversely, the increased light/dark ratio was attenuated dose- dependently by SCH23390, but not by haloperidol. Neither antisecretory agents nor 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonists were effective against the lesion formation. These results suggest that an activation of central dopamine D1 and D2 receptors is responsible for the increased light/dark ratio and enhanced running activity, respectively, and that both of the changes are involved in the etiology of activity-stress induced lesions.

Volume 273, Issue 3, pp. 1001-1007, 06/01/1995
Copyright © 1995 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.