JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filtz, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Molinoff, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Filtz, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Molinoff, P. B.

Mechanisms of up-regulation of D2L dopamine receptors by agonists and antagonists in transfected HEK-293 cells

TM Filtz, W Guan, RP Artymyshyn, M Facheco, C Ford and PB Molinoff

Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Mechanisms underlying agonist- and antagonist-induced up-regulation in HEK-293 cells transfected to express D2 dopamine receptors were investigated. We have reported previously that exposure of cells to agonists and antagonists led to an increase in the density of receptors. The time course of up-regulation on exposure to (-)- sulpiride, a D2 dopamine-selective antagonist, was measured. A lag in the effect of antagonists not seen with up-regulation induced by exposure to agonists was observed. Effects of N-propylnorapomorphine were synergistic with those of cyclic AMP analogs, however, synergistic effects between (-)-sulpiride and cyclic AMP analogs were not observed. These findings suggest that separate mechanisms may be involved in agonist- and antagonist-induced up-regulation. Changes in mRNA levels did not appear to account for the increase in receptors after agonist or antagonist treatment. Results of experiments with cycloheximide, a protein-synthesis inhibitor, suggest that increased protein synthesis, and not decreased protein degradation, is responsible for up-regulation by both NPA and (-)-sulpiride. Studies monitoring receptor recovery after treatment with N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline, an irreversible alkylating agent, suggest that rates of receptor incorporation into membranes are increased after treatment with either an agonist or an antagonist.

Volume 271, Issue 3, pp. 1574-1582, 12/01/1994
Copyright © 1994 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.