JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, J. W.

Role of the 5-HT2 receptor in the methamphetamine-induced neurochemical alterations

M Johnson, PK Sonsalla, AA Letter, GR Hanson and JW Gibb

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

The possibility that serotonin (5-HT) modulates dopamine (DA) synthesis by acting at 5-HT2 receptor sites during methamphetamine (METH) treatment was investigated. The neostriatal accumulation of 3,4- dihydroxyphenylalanine was not altered by ritanserin (1 mg/kg i.p.), a 5-HT2/1c receptor antagonist, or by METH (15 or 25 mg/kg s.c.), which indicates that METH-induced DA and 5-HT release did not invoke increased DA synthesis. Interestingly, the combined treatment of METH with ritanserin reduced 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine formation. We also examined the possibility that 5-HT2 receptors participate in the mechanism by which METH alters central tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH) activities as well as the concentration of neurotensin-like and substance P-like immunoreactivity. Five administrations of METH given at 6-hr intervals reduced neostriatal TH and TPH activity to 27 and 13% of control, respectively, 18 to 20 hr after the last drug administration; ritanserin failed to alter these decreases significantly. Ritanserin also failed to alter the METH- induced increase in neostriatal neurotensin-like immunoreactivity or in nigral neurotensin-like immunoreactivity and substance P-like immunoreactivity. Finally, the administration of ICS 205-930, a 5-HT3/4 receptor antagonist, also failed to prevent the METH-induced decrease in TH and TPH activities at doses below 200 micrograms/kg, whereas a dose of 500 micrograms/kg potentiated the effect of METH. These results suggest that 5-HT2 does not modulate DA synthesis nor does it mediate the changes in central TH and TPH activity, or neurotensin-like immunoreactivity and substance P-like immunoreactivity content induced by METH. Because 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine is reported to stimulate DA synthesis by a 5-HT2 receptor-dependent mechanism, these observations suggest that METH and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine regulate the central dopaminergic system in a different manner.

Volume 270, Issue 1, pp. 97-103, 07/01/1994
Copyright © 1994 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. Munzar, M. D. Laufert, S. W. Kutkat, J. Nováková, and S. R. Goldberg
Effects of Various Serotonin Agonists, Antagonists, and Uptake Inhibitors on the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Methamphetamine in Rats
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1999; 291(1): 239 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.