JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glavinovic, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glavinovic, M. I.
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, D. R.

Speed of action of various muscle relaxants at the neuromuscular junction binding vs. buffering hypothesis

MI Glavinovic, JC Law Min, L Kapural, F Donati and DR Bevan

Department of Anesthesia Research, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

The speed of action of several nondepolarizing muscle relaxants (gallamine, rocuronium, D-tubocurarine, atracurium, vecuronium, pancuronium and doxacurium) was tested iontophoretically at the frog cutaneous pectoris neuromuscular junction at various temperatures. If differences in rate of onset and offset are due to different molecular rates of binding (and unbinding), and of resulting conformational changes, they should be strongly temperature dependent. In contrast, if differences are due to differences in buffered diffusion, temperature dependence should be low to moderate. The onset and recovery time constants of inhibition of brief acetylcholine pulses, caused by long pulses of relaxants for all of the muscle relaxants, were inversely related to apparent dissociation constants (KD values), that ranged from 4.56 microM (gallamine) to 0.11 microM (doxacurium). The kinetics showed only modest temperature dependence (Q10 values of 1/time constant of offset were typically < 1.4). Because KD values of all muscle relaxants were even less temperature dependent (Q10 < 1.3), this suggests that the kinetics of inhibition is probably determined by the extent of buffering in the synaptic cleft, and not by binding and unbinding. Diffusion of relaxants from the synaptic cleft is expected to be strongly buffered, because the nerve terminal presents a physical barrier to diffusion, and because of extremely high density of acetylcholine receptors. The density of acetylcholine receptors can be calculated from the time constant of offset and KD values of various relaxants, assuming that buffer diffusion is determining the kinetics of action of muscle relaxants.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 265, Issue 3, pp. 1181-1186, 06/01/1993
Copyright © 1993 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
D. Demazumder and J. P. Dilger
The Kinetics of Competitive Antagonism by Cisatracurium of Embryonic and Adult Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2001; 60(4): 797 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.