JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prather, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prather, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lal, H.

Conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of ondansetron in benzodiazepine withdrawal

PL Prather, SM Rezazadeh, JD Lane, GA Rowan, ML Hooper, DA Lytle, MW Emmett- Oglesby and H Lal

Department of Pharmacology, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Worth.

These experiments tested the efficacy of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 antagonist ondansetron (OND) in reversing various aspects of benzodiazepine withdrawal in rats. Three tests were used in which the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil was administered to rats receiving chronic administration of chlordiazepoxide. In one test, the elevated plus-maze, flumazenil produced a reduction in time spent in the open arms of the maze; OND completely reversed this effect of flumazenil in a dose-related fashion. However, OND failed to block the effects of the anxiogenic drug pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) in the elevated plus-maze. In a second test, rats were trained to discriminate PTZ. After chlordiazepoxide, flumazenil substituted for PTZ; OND failed to block flumazenil. In a third test, rats maintained on a chronic base line of chlordiazepoxide were trained to discriminate flumazenil from vehicle. In this discrimination, PTZ substituted for flumazenil, and pentobarbital blocked the flumazenil stimulus; OND, however, failed to block the flumazenil stimulus. In a separate set of experiments, OND also failed to reverse the suppression of responding produced in a conditioned emotional response paradigm. Thus, some data from the elevated plus-maze are consistent with the hypothesis that benzodiazepine withdrawal shares common effects with other stimuli known to be anxiogenic, and that OND blocks this aspect of withdrawal. However, all other data are inconsistent with the hypotheses that OND is anxiolytic or has efficacy in reversing benzodiazepine withdrawal. We suggest that ondansetron is likely to have minimal efficacy in humans for the treatment of sedative-hypnotic withdrawal.

Volume 264, Issue 2, pp. 622-630, 02/01/1993
Copyright © 1993 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1993 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.