JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charlesworth, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Charlesworth, E. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, L. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHLORPHENIRAMINE
*HYDROXYZINE
*PROMETHAZINE

Effect of H1 receptor blockade on the early and late response to cutaneous allergen challenge

EN Charlesworth, WA Massey, A Kagey-Sobotka, PS Norman and LM Lichtenstein

Johns Hopkins University, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

We investigated whether cutaneous antigen-induced inflammatory cell infiltration and mediator release were modified by H1 receptor antagonists. Three chemically unrelated antihistamines (cetirizine, promethazine and chlorpheniramine) were tested in three groups of allergic subjects in a double-blind, crossover design. Chamber fluids were collected for 12 hr and histamine release, prostaglandin D2 production and cellular infiltration were quantified. Cetirizine significantly decreased late leukocyte migration into antigen- challenged chambers: eosinophils by 68% (P less than .04), basophils by 64% (P less than .04) and neutrophils by 72% (P less than .04), whereas mononuclear cells were not significantly affected. No alteration in the numbers of peripheral blood leukocytes or eosinophils occurred while on cetirizine treatment, suggesting that the decrease in inflammatory cells during the late phase reaction in the skin is not secondary to alterations in the peripheral leukocyte pool. In contrast, neither promethazine nor chlorpheniramine induced any significant alteration in inflammatory cell infiltration. All three antihistamines caused significant inhibition of the immediate reaction to antigen without any significant alteration in late phase reaction cutaneous reactivity. None of the three antihistamines caused any significant alteration in histamine or prostaglandin D2 levels. Thus, cetirizine may be an antihistamine uniquely capable of downregulating the late phase reaction inflammatory cell milieu without altering either early or late mediator production. The mechanisms involved and the clinical relevance of these findings remain to be explored.

Volume 262, Issue 3, pp. 964-970, 09/01/1992
Copyright © 1992 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.