JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Preston, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Preston, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, G. E.

Discrimination of agonist-antagonist opioids in humans trained on a two- choice saline-hydromorphone discrimination

KL Preston, IA Liebson and GE Bigelow

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Francis Scott Key Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

The stimulus properties of four opioid agonist-antagonists were assessed in postaddict volunteers trained in a two-choice drug discrimination procedure to discriminate between the effects of i.m. saline and hydromorphone (3 mg/70 kg). Behavioral, subjective and physiological measures were concurrently collected. After training, generalization curves were determined for hydromorphone, pentazocine, butorphanol, nalbuphine and buprenorphine. In generalization testing, hydromorphone produced dose-related increases in hydromorphone- appropriate responses and in characteristic opioid agonist-like subjective effects measures. In general, each of the study drugs produced a profile of subjective and physiological effects similar to that reported in other human studies. These subjective indices showed the study drugs to be heterogeneous. However, in this two-choice drug discrimination procedure, they were discriminated as homogeneous (i.e., all were discriminated as hydromorphone-like). The present study also found that all test drugs were subjectively identified as being opiates, and all were subjectively rated as similar to the hydromorphone training condition. A previous three-choice discrimination was sensitive to the heterogeneity among these drugs on both the discrimination measures and subjective ratings of similarity to the hydromorphone training condition. Thus, the specific procedures of drug discrimination studies may have an effect on some subjective indices, although this interaction is not apparent for the majority of subjective effect measures. Also, the characterization of opioids in drug discrimination testing appears to depend upon the specific training subjects receive; this is most clear with discrimination measures, and to a more limited extent, with subjective measures.

Volume 261, Issue 1, pp. 62-71, 04/01/1992
Copyright © 1992 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav Cogn Neurosci RevHome page
T. H. Kelly, W. W. Stoops, A. S. Perry, M. A. Prendergast, and C. R. Rush
Clinical Neuropharmacology of Drugs of Abuse: A Comparison of Drug-Discrimination and Subject-Report Measures
Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, December 1, 2003; 2(4): 227 - 260.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. L. Preston and G. E. Bigelow
Effects of Agonist-Antagonist Opioids in Humans Trained in a Hydromorphone/Not Hydromorphone Discrimination
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2000; 295(1): 114 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. E. Jones, G. E. Bigelow, and K. L. Preston
Assessment of Opioid Partial Agonist Activity with a Three-Choice Hydromorphone Dose-Discrimination Procedure
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1999; 289(3): 1350 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. P. Zacny, J. L. Hill, M. L. Black, and P. Sadeghi
Comparing the Subjective, Psychomotor and Physiological Effects of Intravenous Pentazocine and Morphine in Normal Volunteers
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1998; 286(3): 1197 - 1207.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
T. E. Schlaepfer, E. C. Strain, B. D. Greenberg, K. L. Preston, E. Lancaster, G. E. Bigelow, P. E. Barta, and G. D. Pearlson
Site of Opioid Action in the Human Brain: Mu and Kappa Agonists' Subjective and Cerebral Blood Flow Effects
Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 1998; 155(4): 470 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. P. Zacny, K. Conley, and J. Galinkin
Comparing the Subjective, Psychomotor and Physiological Effects of Intravenous Buprenorphine and Morphine in Healthy Volunteers
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1997; 282(3): 1187 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. P. Zacny, K. Conley, and S. Marks
Comparing the Subjective, Psychomotor and Physiological Effects of Intravenous Nalbuphine and Morphine in Healthy Volunteers
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1997; 280(3): 1159 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.