JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gibb, J. W.

Response of extrapyramidal and limbic neuropeptides to fenfluramine administration: comparison with methamphetamine

GR Hanson, N Singh, L Bush and JW Gibb

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

The responses of extrapyramidal and limbic neuropeptide and striatal dopamine and serotonin systems were evaluated after treatment with fenfluramine in rats. After multiple administrations of fenfluramine, its active metabolite, norfenfluramine, and methamphetamine (METH), striatal neurotensin (NT) content was similarly increased to approximately 200% of control. In contrast, nigral NT levels were unaltered by fenfluramine, intermediately increased by norfenfluramine (148% of control) and maximally increased by METH (267% of control). Striatal and nigral substance P (SP) and dynorphin A (Dyn) systems were unaltered by fenfluramine, whereas norfenfluramine caused an intermediate increase in striatal Dyn content but did not significantly alter striatal SP or nigral SP and Dyn levels. However, METH significantly elevated striatal and nigral Dyn and SP concentrations to 280 to 425% (Dyn) and 140% (SP) of control. For the most part, the response of the limbic peptides was similar to that seen in the striatum with a couple of notable differences. Further investigation of the striatal NT system showed that the increases induced by fenfluramine were completely blocked by the D1 antagonist, SCH 23390, and the noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, MK801. Depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine with pretreatment by parachloroamphetamine did not alter the response of the striatal NT system to fenfluramine. The present results demonstrate common and unique features in the response of peptide systems to fenfluramine and methamphetamine, which might explain some of the similarities and differences between these two drugs.

Volume 259, Issue 3, pp. 1197-1202, 12/01/1991
Copyright © 1991 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.