JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mather, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, Y. F.
Right arrow Articles by Mather, L. E.

Insight into interstitial drug disposition: lymph concentrations of lidocaine, procainamide and meperidine in the hindquarters of unanesthetized and anesthetized sheep

YF Huang, RN Upton, WB Runciman and LE Mather

Department of Anaesthesia, University of Adelaide, Australia.

Drug concentrations in the lymph of the hindquarters of sheep were used to gain insight into drug disposition within the interstitial space. Lidocaine, procainamide and meperidine were each infused into the right atrium of adult merino ewes for 220 min. The time courses of drug concentrations in arterial and inferior vena caval (IVC, draining the hindquarters) blood and hindquarter lymph were determined. It was found that in unanesthetized sheep the mean (+/- S.D., n = 3) lidocaine, procainamide and meperidine concentrations in the hindquarter lymph, were 74 +/- 11, 107 +/- 25 and 94 +/- 17%, respectively, of the arterial and 92 +/- 15, 113 +/- 27 and 134 +/- 28%, respectively, of the IVC blood drug concentrations. Drug binding in lymph, determined by equilibrium dialysis, was not significantly higher than that in blood, except for lidocaine at an initial buffer concentration of 5 micrograms/ml. When the studies were repeated with different animals under halothane anesthesia, the lymph/arterial and lymph/IVC blood drug concentration ratios of the three drugs decreased to 66 +/- 9, 73 +/- 13 and 71 +/- 13% and 77 +/- 8, 88 +/- 19 and 85 +/- 10%, respectively. These values were all significantly lower than those in unanesthetized animals. The results suggest that drug protein binding in interstitial fluid and the status of the microcirculation are important determinants of drug distribution in the interstitial and intracellular spaces. The data also confirm the assumption made in pharmacokinetic studies based upon mass balance principles that the rate of drug removal from organs by lymph is negligible.

Volume 256, Issue 1, pp. 69-75, 01/01/1991
Copyright © 1991 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.