JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelland, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chiodo, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelland, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Chiodo, L. A.

Effects of (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine on midbrain dopamine neurons: an electrophysiological study

MD Kelland, AS Freeman, PA LeWitt and LA Chiodo

Laboratory of Neurophysiology, Sinai Research Institute, Detroit, Michigan.

(+)-4-Propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine (PHNO) is a highly potent, D2- selective dopamine (DA) receptor agonist. In the present study, we have examined the electrophysiological effects of PHNO on identified nigrostriatal DA (NSDA), mesoaccumbens DA (MADA) and Type I caudate neurons. Intravenous PHNO dose-dependently inhibited the firing rate of NSDA and MADA neurons in both chloral hydrate (CH)-anesthetized rats (ED50 values = 21.2 +/- 1.2 and 26.5 +/- 1.4 ng/kg, respectively) and locally anesthetized, paralyzed rats (ED50 values = 105.0 +/- 1.4 and 109.1 +/- 1.4 ng/kg, respectively). PHNO was significantly more potent in the CH-anesthetized rats. There was a significant, positive correlation between basal firing rate and log ED50 for NSDA neurons in both preparations and for MADA cells only in CH-anesthetized animals. Neither pretreatment with the D1 receptor agonist SKF 38393 nor hemitransection of the forebrain altered the rate-dependent nature of PHNO-induced inhibition of NSDA neurons. Likewise, depletions of serotonin with either p-chlorophenylalanine or 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine failed to alter the rate-dependent PHNO-induced inhibition of NSDA neurons. Iontophoretically applied PHNO inhibited both NSDA and MADA neurons to a similar degree as either DA or the D2 agonist quinpirole. In contrast, the similar effects of PHNO and quinpirole on Type I caudate neurons were significantly different than those of DA. These results suggest that PHNO inhibits midbrain DA neurons via stimulation of somatodendritic autoreceptors and that PHNO exhibits an electrophysiological profile characteristic of D2 agonists. In contrast to quinpirole, however, the rate-dependent nature of PHNO-induced inhibition of these cells was resistant to modulation.

Volume 255, Issue 1, pp. 276-284, 10/01/1990
Copyright © 1990 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.