JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warner, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buckner, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warner, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buckner, C. K.

Pharmacologic studies on the differential influence of inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase on nonadrenergic, noncholinergic contractile responses of the guinea pig isolated hilar bronchus to transmural electrical stimulation and exogenously applied tachykinins

EA Warner, RD Krell and CK Buckner

Department of Pharmacology, ICI Americas Inc., Wilmington, Delaware.

Nonadrenergic, noncholinergic contractile responses of guinea pig hilar bronchi to transmural electrical stimulation (TES) have been suggested to be due to release of endogenous tachykinins from capsaicin-sensitive neurons (C-fibers). Thiorphan and phosphoramidon, inhibitors of neutral endopeptidase (NEP, the major enzyme responsible for degrading tachykinins), were found to potentiate contractile responses of this isolated airway segment to TES and exogenously applied capsaicin, substance P and neurokinin A. However, the magnitude of potentiation by either inhibitor was smaller for TES and capsaicin (less than 10-fold leftward shift) than for the substrate agonists (about 100-fold leftward shift). This quantitative difference in potentiation by NEP inhibitors does not appear to be due to an influence of vasoactive intestinal peptide or calcitonin gene-related peptide, two endogenous peptides that might be released concomitantly by TES. Neither peptide caused marked effects on contractile responses to TES or tachykinins when applied to the isolated tissues. Addition of inhibitors of serine proteases, aminopeptidases, acetylcholinesterase and angiotensin- converting enzyme failed to further potentiate responses to TES in the presence of thiorphan. Therefore, the contractile response does not appear to be further modified by the activity of these peptidases. Neuropeptide gamma, but not neuropeptide K, was potentiated by thiorphan. The data suggest that peptides that are not substrates for NEP (for example, neuropeptide K) may also be released by TES from capsaicin-sensitive neurons to cause contraction. This may, at least in part, explain the quantitative difference in potentiation by NEP inhibitors of contractile responses to TES and to exogenously applied NEP-sensitive tachykinins in the guinea pig hilar bronchus.

Volume 254, Issue 3, pp. 824-830, 09/01/1990
Copyright © 1990 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. M. Cibulsky and D. C. Thompson
Absence of Tachykinin Involvement in Leukotriene D4 and Antigen-Induced Contraction of Guinea Pig Isolated Bronchus
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 1997; 283(3): 1102 - 1109.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.