JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiner, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Sheiner, L. B.

Pharmacodynamic modeling of verapamil effects under steady-state and nonsteady-state conditions

JB Schwartz, D Verotta and LB Sheiner

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Pharmacodynamic models relating the plasma concentration (Cp) of verapamil to the drug's effect (E) on the P-R interval were investigated after single dose infusions of (0.15-0.22 mg/kg) verapamil in 22 normal subjects. Model predictions of the steady-state Cp-E relationship were then compared to results from actual steady-state drug infusions in the same subjects. Two methods of estimating the steady-state concentration response relationship from the single dose data were examined: 1) the relationship of descending limb Cp vs. E and 2) the relationship of estimated effect site concentrations (Ce) vs. E. When compared to experimental steady-state measurements, the absolute errors of predictions from the Ce vs. E method were less than those from the Cp vs. E predictions (6.8 +/- 4.4 vs. 9.6 +/- 6.6, mean +/- S.D.). Similarly, the slope of the linear regression of E on Cp differed more from the observed steady-state slope than the slope of E on Ce. Sigmoid Emax models fit to Cp vs. E. data gave false Emax values even when data immediately following drug infusion were disregarded whereas Ce vs. E plots demonstrated that Emax was not reached (and Ce much less than Cp). Neither the postinfusion (descending limb) Cp vs. E nor Ce vs. E plots allowed analysis of higher concentration vs. effect relationships after usual (0.15-0.22 mg/kg) doses of verapamil. In summary, we have demonstrated that nonsteady-state postdrug infusion effect vs. plasma concentration data for verapamil does not reflect the true steady-state relationship and that use of a model to estimate effect site concentration provides a closer estimate of the true steady- state relationship.

Volume 251, Issue 3, pp. 1032-1038, 12/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
K.-M. Chu, O. Y.-P. Hu, and S.-M. Shieh
Cardiovascular Effect and Simultaneous Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Pimobendan in Healthy Normal Subjects
Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 1999; 27(6): 701 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Y. F. Huang, R. N. Upton, D. Zheng, C. Mclean, E. C. Gray, and C. Grant
The Enantiomer-Specific Kinetics and Dynamics of Verapamil after Rapid Intravenous Administration to Sheep: Physiological Analysis and Modeling
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1998; 284(3): 1048 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. S. Gross, G. Mikus, D. Ratge, H. Wisser, and M. Eichelbaum

J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1997; 281(3): 1102 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.