![]() |
|
|
JB Schwartz, D Verotta and LB Sheiner
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Pharmacodynamic models relating the plasma concentration (Cp) of verapamil to the drug's effect (E) on the P-R interval were investigated after single dose infusions of (0.15-0.22 mg/kg) verapamil in 22 normal subjects. Model predictions of the steady-state Cp-E relationship were then compared to results from actual steady-state drug infusions in the same subjects. Two methods of estimating the steady-state concentration response relationship from the single dose data were examined: 1) the relationship of descending limb Cp vs. E and 2) the relationship of estimated effect site concentrations (Ce) vs. E. When compared to experimental steady-state measurements, the absolute errors of predictions from the Ce vs. E method were less than those from the Cp vs. E predictions (6.8 +/- 4.4 vs. 9.6 +/- 6.6, mean +/- S.D.). Similarly, the slope of the linear regression of E on Cp differed more from the observed steady-state slope than the slope of E on Ce. Sigmoid Emax models fit to Cp vs. E. data gave false Emax values even when data immediately following drug infusion were disregarded whereas Ce vs. E plots demonstrated that Emax was not reached (and Ce much less than Cp). Neither the postinfusion (descending limb) Cp vs. E nor Ce vs. E plots allowed analysis of higher concentration vs. effect relationships after usual (0.15-0.22 mg/kg) doses of verapamil. In summary, we have demonstrated that nonsteady-state postdrug infusion effect vs. plasma concentration data for verapamil does not reflect the true steady-state relationship and that use of a model to estimate effect site concentration provides a closer estimate of the true steady- state relationship.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K.-M. Chu, O. Y.-P. Hu, and S.-M. Shieh Cardiovascular Effect and Simultaneous Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Pimobendan in Healthy Normal Subjects Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 1999; 27(6): 701 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. F. Huang, R. N. Upton, D. Zheng, C. Mclean, E. C. Gray, and C. Grant The Enantiomer-Specific Kinetics and Dynamics of Verapamil after Rapid Intravenous Administration to Sheep: Physiological Analysis and Modeling J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 1998; 284(3): 1048 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Gross, G. Mikus, D. Ratge, H. Wisser, and M. Eichelbaum J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1997; 281(3): 1102 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||