JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trivedi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trivedi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, L. L.

Pharmacologic experiments on the interaction between crotoxin and the mammalian neuromuscular junction

S Trivedi, II Kaiser, M Tanaka and LL Simpson

Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Crotoxin and its two subunits were tested for their neuromuscular blocking activity on the phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparation. Two types of experimental paradigms were used, the first of which separated the toxin binding step from subsequent events in paralysis and the second of which did not. In both paradigms the toxin produced concentration-dependent blockade of transmission. However, the results with low concentrations were variable, and in some cases complete neuromuscular blockade did not develop. The isolated acidic and basic subunits possessed little toxicity. In experiments designed to characterize binding, the intact toxin displayed the following properties: 1) the apparent half-time for tissue association was about 22 min; 2) binding was not affected by low temperature, the presence or absence of nerve stimulation and the substitution of strontium for calcium; and 3) when binding was allowed to go to completion, reversibility was negligible. Pretreatment of tissues with the isolated subunits of crotoxin did not enhance or inhibit the binding of the parent molecule. Modification of one histidine residue in the isolated basic subunit, followed by reconstitution with unmodified acidic subunit, generated a molecule that possessed only about 10% of the neurotoxicity of the native toxin. The modified toxin could not be used to antagonize binding of the native toxin. Both polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies were generated that neutralized the biologic activity of crotoxin. In experiments that separated the binding step from later events in paralysis, the polyclonal preparation continued to locate and partially neutralize tissue-bound toxin. In experiments that initiated events that follow binding, polyclonal antibodies were progressively less effective with time in neutralizing toxin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 251, Issue 2, pp. 490-496, 11/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Cura, D. P. Blanzaco, C. Brisson, M. A. Cura, R. Cabrol, L. Larrateguy, C. Mendez, J. C. Sechi, J. S. Silveira, E. Theiller, et al.
Phase I and Pharmacokinetics Study of Crotoxin (Cytotoxic PLA2, NSC-624244) in Patients with Advanced Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 1033 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.