JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cory-Slechta, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Newland, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cory-Slechta, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Newland, M. C.

Behavioral differentiation of the stimulus properties of a dopaminergic D1 agonist from a D2 agonist

DA Cory-Slechta, DV Widzowski and MC Newland

Environmental Health Sciences Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York.

This study examined the hypothesis that the stimulus properties of a dopaminergic D1 agonist should be functionally discriminable from those of a D2 agonist. Rats were trained in a two-lever food-reinforced drug discrimination paradigm to discriminate either the D1 agonist SKF 38393 from apomorphine (SKF/APO), SKF from saline (SKF/SAL) or apomorphine from saline (APO/SAL), at an APO dose previously established to have D2- mediated stimulus properties. Results showed the SKF/APO discrimination to be readily acquired. The SKF cue showed similar stimulus properties under both the SKF/APO and SKF/SAL training conditions which were mediated by the D1 receptor: the SKF response was blocked by the D1 antagonist SCH 23390, but not by the D2 antagonist haloperidol. Run length data suggested a graded rather than quantal effect of SKF dose on responding during SKF generalization tests. In APO/SAL-trained animals, the APO cue was D2 mediated; responding was blocked by haloperidol, but not by SCH 23390 and APO responding generalized to the selective D2 agonist LY 171555 (quinpirole), but not to SKF. In the SKF/APO condition, APO responding did not decrease with APO dose, nor were antagonists effective in blocking responding, reflecting the lack of an alternative no-drug response option. Higher doses of APO appear to have D1 properties; doses above the training dose engendered SKF responding in both the SKF/SAL and SKF/APO groups, a response which could be blocked by the D1 antagonist SCH 23390, but not by the D2 antagonist, haloperidol. In all three training conditions, generalization test outcomes could be influenced by the conditions of the previous test session.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 250, Issue 3, pp. 800-808, 09/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
E. B. Nielsen and P. H. Andersen
Drug discrimination approaches to the behavioral role of the D-1 receptor
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1992; 6(1): 43 - 49.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.