JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voelker, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brater, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Voelker, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brater, D. C.

In vitro evidence that urine composition affects the fraction of active furosemide in the nephrotic syndrome

JR Voelker, DM Jameson and DC Brater

Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.

Diuretic resistance to furosemide in the nephrotic syndrome (NS) may result from binding of drug to filtered albumin within the renal tubule. In buffer solutions intended to partially mimic the luminal environment of the distal nephron during the NS, we examined several chemical properties to determine their effect on furosemide-albumin binding equilibria. Dissociation constants were obtained by measuring furosemide's quenching of human serum albumin's intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence over ranges of pH, ionic strength (IS) and osmolarity. Neither pH nor osmolarity significantly affected binding; however, incremental increases in IS between 0.0 and 1.0 produced increases in Kd from 0.65 +/- 0.05 to 34.38 +/- 1.72 microM, resulting in a 5- and 28-fold increase in the unbound furosemide fraction when the furosemide- albumin concentrations were 3.0:5.0 and 10.0:45.0 microM, respectively. Our results indicate that human serum albumin contains one high affinity binding site for furosemide that is sensitive to IS. Because of changes in the concentrations of reactants as well as IS that can occur in nephron segments distal to furosemide's site of action, we conclude that the amount of unbound (i.e., pharmacologically active) drug in voided urine will not necessarily correspond to the amount at the active site. To clinically assess the pharmacodynamic consequence of protein binding in the NS, changes in the concentration of the reactants and IS in the distal nephron must be minimized so that the unbound furosemide measured in voided urine will accurately reflect the amount at the drug's active site.

Volume 250, Issue 3, pp. 772-778, 09/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. AGARWAL, J. C. GORSKI, K. SUNDBLAD, and D. C. BRATER
Urinary Protein Binding Does Not Affect Response to Furosemide in Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2000; 11(6): 1100 - 1105.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. E. Petersen, C.-E. Ha, D. M. Jameson, and N. V. Bhagavan
Mutations in a Specific Human Serum Albumin Thyroxine Binding Site Define the Structural Basis of Familial Dysalbuminemic Hyperthyroxinemia
J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 1996; 271(32): 19110 - 19117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.