JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coffin, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chipkin, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coffin, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chipkin, R. E.

Acute extrapyramidal syndrome in Cebus monkeys: development mediated by dopamine D2 but not D1 receptors

VL Coffin, MB Latranyi and RE Chipkin

Schering-Plough Research, Bloomfield, New Jersey.

The present study assessed the role of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the production of an extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) in Cebus apella monkeys. Previous studies have shown the development of EPS in both old and new world monkeys with haloperidol administration. We now report that repeated weekly administration of a selective D1 antagonist, SCH 23390, does not produce this syndrome in cebus monkeys. Cebus monkeys were treated with either vehicle (n = 6), the specific D2 antagonist haloperidol (0.3 mg/kg p.o., n = 9) or the specific D1 antagonist SCH 23390 (10.0 mg/kg p.o., n = 9) once a week for approximately 1 year and behavioral effects were observed and scored. The drug doses used in this study produced similar sedative scores when given acutely and sedation increased over the first 12 weeks of the study for both treatment groups. However, by the 12th week of dosing with haloperidol all the monkeys showed a profound EPS characterized by limb extensions, head pushing, tongue protrusions and sometimes severe biting movements. In contrast, none of the SCH 23390-treated monkeys showed any abnormal movements, suggesting D1 antagonists have a low EPS side-effect liability. The profile of the incidence of EPS seen with classical neuroleptic drugs in cebus monkeys and their blockade of EPS by anticholinergic drugs mimics the profile seen in humans. The models presented appear to be predictive of the production of the EPS in humans and could be used to screen neuroleptics for EPS liability. Furthermore, the EPS is probably due to the selective blockade of dopamine D2 receptors with its associated enhancement of cholinergic neurotransmission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 249, Issue 3, pp. 769-774, 06/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
W. J. Florijn, F. I. Tarazi, and I. Creese
Dopamine Receptor Subtypes: Differential Regulation after 8 Months Treatment with Antipsychotic Drugs
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 1997; 280(2): 561 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
J. Gerlach and L. Hansen
Effect of chronic treatment with NNC 756, a new D-1 receptor antagonist, or raclopride, a D-2 receptor antagonist, in drug-naive Cebus monkeys: dystonia, dyskinesia and D-1/D-2 supersensitivity
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1993; 7(4): 355 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
E. Ongini and M. Trampus
Modulation of sleep and waking states by D-1 receptors
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1992; 6(1): 61 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.