JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johanson, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Johanson, C. E.

Discriminative stimulus properties of midazolam in the pigeon

SM Evans and CE Johanson

Department of Psychiatry, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois.

Five pigeons were trained to discriminate injections of midazolam (1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg i.m.) from saline with responding maintained under a fixed- ratio 30 schedule of food delivery. When other benzodiazepines were tested, they consistently produced greater than 80% of midazolam- appropriate responding. The order of potency for substituting for midazolam was triazolam greater than alprazolam = diazepam = lorazepam greater than midazolam greater than flurazepam = nitrazepam greater than nordiazepam. The barbiturate phenobarbital (10-100 mg/kg) substituted for midazolam in three of four pigeons whereas pentobarbital (1.0-30 mg/kg) substituted in only two of five pigeons. Several nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics were also evaluated. Methaqualone (3.0-56 mg/kg) substituted in only one of four pigeons and meprobamate (30-100 mg/kg) failed to substitute in any pigeon tested. CL 218,872, when administered either i.m. (0.3-30 mg/kg) or p.o. (1.0-56 mg/kg), and buspirone (0.3-30 mg/kg) did not substitute for midazolam. Compounds from pharmacological classes not related to midazolam also failed to substitute for midazolam. Pretreatment with the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil (Ro 15-1788; 0.03-1.0 mg/kg) antagonized the discriminative stimulus properties of midazolam in a dose-related manner in all pigeons tested. However, this antagonism could not be overcome with increasing doses of midazolam in all pigeons. The results of the present study demonstrate that midazolam is an effective discriminative stimulus in the pigeon. Benzodiazepine anxiolytics, but not other compounds with sedative and/or anxiolytic properties, were found to reliably substitute for midazolam. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of midazolam are pharmacologically selective.

Volume 248, Issue 1, pp. 29-38, 01/01/1989
Copyright © 1989 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
W. Koek, L. R. Flores, L. P. Carter, R. J. Lamb, W. Chen, H. Wu, A. Coop, and C. P. France
Discriminative Stimulus Effects of {gamma}-Hydroxybutyrate in Pigeons: Role of Diazepam-Sensitive and -Insensitive GABAA and GABAB Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2004; 308(3): 904 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. A. Ator and R. R. Griffiths
Selectivity in the Generalization Profile in Baboons Trained to Discriminate Lorazepam: Benzodiazepines, Barbiturates and Other Sedative/Anxiolytics
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 1997; 282(3): 1442 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.