JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erwin, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erwin, V. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B. C.

Central muscarinic cholinergic influences on ethanol sensitivity in long-sleep and short-sleep mice

VG Erwin, A Korte and BC Jones

Alcohol Research Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Sensitivity to the hypnotic effects of ethanol was increased selectively by central administration of muscarinic agonists. Carbachol or oxotremorine, but not nicotine, i.c.v., enhanced hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol markedly, as measured by blood ethanol concentration at loss or righting response, in short-sleep (SS) but not long-sleep (LS) mice. Likewise, the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, neostigmine, i.c.v., differentially enhanced hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol in these mouse lines. LS and SS mice were equally sensitive to the hypothermic effects of carbachol, neostigmine or oxotremorine i.c.v. The muscarinic antagonists, atropine or pirenzepine, i.c.v., were without effect on ethanol sensitivity, but these compounds antagonized muscarinic agonist-enhanced ethanol sensitivity in SS mice effectively. Pirenzepine, and M1 selective antagonist, produced a parallel shift in the oxotremorine dose-response curve, indicating that the enhanced hypnotic sensitivity to ethanol may be due to interaction of oxotremorine with M1 muscarinic receptors. This possibility was supported by the finding that atropine and pirenzepine which are known to have comparable affinities for M1 but not M2 receptors, had comparable potencies in antagonizing the action of oxotremorine or neostigmine. The results suggest that LS and SS mice differ genetically in neuronal processes activated by specific muscarinic agonists and are consistent with the hypotheses that ethanol acts in part via membrane receptor coupling to intracellular processes known to mobilize intracellular Ca++.

Volume 247, Issue 3, pp. 857-862, 12/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. A. Stitzel, M. Jimenez, M. J. Marks, T. Tritto, and A. C. Collins
Potential Role of the alpha 4 and alpha 6 Nicotinic Receptor Subunits in Regulating Nicotine-Induced Seizures
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2000; 293(1): 67 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.