JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Falk, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tang, M.
Right arrow Articles by Falk, J. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*MIDAZOLAM HYDROCHLORIDE

Midazolam and discriminative motor control: chronic administration, withdrawal and modulation by the antagonist Ro 15-1788

M Tang, CE Lau and JL Falk

Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

To evaluate the effects of chronic midazolam (8-chloro-6-(2- fluorophenyl)-1-methyl-4H- imidazo[1,5-a][1,4]benzodiazepine) administration on discriminative motor control, rats were trained to hold a force transducer operated with a paw so that it remained between upper and lower limits of a force band for a continuous 1.5-sec period to deliver each food pellet. Acute doses of midazolam (0.75-3.0 mg/kg s.c.) impaired indices of motor performance as well as session work rate, a measure of sedation. Separate groups received chronic midazolam injections either pressession (Before Group) or postsession (After Group), or presession vehicle (Vehicle Group). The After and Vehicle Groups indicated that neither chronic postsession midazolam, its withdrawal, nor time alone, changed motor performance. The Before Group was affected, and although complete tolerance to work-rate decrements developed rapidly to chronic dosing (3.0 mg/kg), tolerance to motor impairment was incomplete even after 4 months. Presession drug probes with midazolam to the After Group revealed that, although tolerance to work-rate decrement had developed, no tolerance had developed with respect to the capacity for midazolam to impair motor performance. During the chronic phase of midazolam injection to the Before Group, sessions that omitted midazolam, or antagonized it with Ro 15-1788, led to improved motor performance (a drug-purge effect). Precipitated withdrawal was not produced by Ro 15-1788, although simple drug withdrawal did disrupt Before Group motor performance after 4 months of chronic dosing. Ensuing sessions showed a marked improvement in motor performance which returned to the original, prechronic, base-line level.

Volume 246, Issue 3, pp. 1053-1060, 09/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.