JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grover, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parham, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grover, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Parham, C. S.

Effect of diltiazem on infarct size, reperfusion flow and flow reserve: the effect of timing of treatment

GJ Grover, PG Sleph and CS Parham

Department of Pharmacology, Squibb Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, New Jersey.

This study was performed to determine if improved subendocardial reflow seen with diltiazem pretreatment after left circumflex coronary (LCX) occlusion is due to a direct vasodilatory effect of diltiazem on the reperfused bed or due to an increased flow maximum or reserve. In the first part of this study anesthetized dogs were subjected to saline or diltiazem (infused starting before, 10 min after LCX occlusion or 2 min before reperfusion; 0.18 mg/kg + 0.45 mg/kg/hr i.v. for all groups) treatment with a 90-min LCX occlusion and 5-hr reperfusion and myocardial blood flow and infarct size were determined at the end of the experiment. In the second part, maximal flow using intracoronary adenosine was determined at 1 and 3 hr postreperfusion in the ischemic bed when pretreated with saline or diltiazem. Myocardial infarct size was reduced significantly only in animals pretreated with diltiazem compared to saline-treated animals. At 1-hr postreperfusion, subendocardial flow (microspheres) was significantly higher only with diltiazem pretreatment compared to the saline group (100 +/- 17 vs. 54 +/- 8 ml/min/100 g, respectively) and subendocardial reperfusion flows were negatively correlated to infarct size (r = 0.97, P less than .05). Thus, diltiazem only improves reflow and infarct size when infused before occlusion and this improved reflow does not occur via a direct vasodilator action of diltiazem. When maximal vasodilating doses of adenosine were given, flow in the ischemic region was nearly identical for saline and diltiazem pretreated groups despite higher preadenosine flows in the diltiazem group (higher resting flow occurred at the expense of the existing flow reserve).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 246, Issue 1, pp. 263-269, 07/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.