JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoffelmeer, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoffelmeer, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, A. H.

M-1 and M-2 muscarinic receptor-mediated inhibition of dopamine- sensitive adenylate cyclase in rat neostriatum: a permissive role for D- 2 dopamine receptors

AN Schoffelmeer, F Hogenboom and AH Mulder

Department of Pharmacology, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

The interactions between dopamine and muscarinic receptor subtypes coupled to adenylate cyclase in superfused rat neostriatal slices were investigated using the efflux of cyclic AMP, in the presence of the phosphodiesterase inhibitor 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, as a highly sensitive parameter of cyclic AMP production. Cyclic AMP efflux induced by simultaneous activation of (stimulatory) D-1 and (inhibitory) D-2 dopamine receptors by dopamine was reduced profoundly by the muscarinic receptor agonist oxotremorine and by inhibition of acetylcholinesterase with physostigmine, but not by the M-1 muscarinic receptor agonist McN- A-343. In contrast, upon blockade of D-2 receptors with (-)-sulpiride, dopamine-stimulated cyclic AMP efflux was inhibited by oxotremorine and physostigmine as well as by McN-A-343. Cyclic AMP efflux induced by isoprenaline, adenosine or vasoactive intestinal peptide was not affected by oxotremorine. The M-1 receptor-selective antagonist pirenzepine, unlike the nonselective antagonist atropine, was about 10 times less potent in antagonizing the inhibitory effects of (a near- maximally effective concentration of) oxotremorine upon simultaneous D- 1 and D-2 receptor activation that upon selective D-1 receptor activation (i.e., upon blockade of D-2 receptors). In the latter case, pirenzepine was about 5 times more effective as an antagonist when muscarinic receptors were activated by McN-A-343 than upon exposure of the slices to oxotremorine or physostigmine, whereas the potency of atropine was independent of the agonist used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 245, Issue 2, pp. 658-663, 05/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.