JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takeuchi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Okabe, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takeuchi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Okabe, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CIMETIDINE
*HISTAMINE
*HYDROCHLORIC ACID
*INDOMETHACIN
*THIOUREA
*TRIPELENNAMINE

Mucosal protective action of histamine against gastric lesions induced by HCl in rats: importance of antigastric motor activity mediated by H2- receptors

K Takeuchi, H Nishiwaki, M Okada and S Okabe

Department of Applied Pharmacology, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Japan.

The present study was undertaken to investigate the possible mechanism of histamine cytoprotection against 0.6 N HCl-induced gastric lesions in rats by 1) examining functional alterations such as acid secretion, gastric motor activity and mucosal vascular permeability in response to histamine and by 2) comparing the effects of histamine with those of 2- (2-pyridil)-ethylamine (PEA), an H1-agonist and of dimaprit, an H2- agonist. Histamine (3-20 mg/kg s.c.) dose-dependently increased acid secretion, inhibited motor activity and reduced the mucosal lesions in response to 0.6 N HCl. Similar effects were observed dose-dependently with dimaprit (10-40 mg/kg s.c.), but not with PEA (10 mg/kg s.c.). The protective action of both histamine and dimaprit was attenuated significantly by cimetidine (100 mg/kg s.c.) and indomethacin (5 mg/kg s.c.), but not by tripelennamine (10 mg/kg s.c.), which by itself inhibited significantly motor activity and the lesions. Stimulation of acid secretion caused by histamine as well as dimaprit was antagonized significantly by cimetidine, whereas antigastric motor effects of these agents were decreased significantly by both cimetidine and indomethacin. Histamine and PEA increased significantly the vascular permeability as measured by Evans blue, but the increased vascular permeability caused by 0.6 N HCl was reduced markedly by both histamine and dimaprit. These results suggest that the mucosal protective action of histamine may be mediated at least partly by endogenous prostaglandins through stimulation of H2-receptors, and may be associated with the effect on gastric motor activity but not with that on the mucosal vasculature.

Volume 245, Issue 2, pp. 632-638, 05/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
K. Takeuchi, H. Araki, M. Umeda, Y. Komoike, and K. Suzuki
Adaptive Gastric Cytoprotection Is Mediated by Prostaglandin EP1 Receptors: A Study Using Rats and Knockout Mice
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2001; 297(3): 1160 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.