JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holohan, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holohan, P. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, C. R.

Effect of parathyroid hormone on gentamicin plasma membrane binding and tissue accumulation

PD Holohan, WC Elliott, E Grace and CR Ross

Department of Pharmacology, SUNY/Health Science Center at Syracuse.

Reportedly, the initiating event in the renal uptake of gentamicin is its binding to anionic, plasma membrane phospholipids. Because parathyroid hormone is known to affect phospholipid metabolism, the plasma membrane binding and tissue accumulation of gentamicin were examined as a function of the parathyroid hormone status of the animal. The experiments were conducted by evaluating the parameters in isolated brush border and basolateral membranes from control, hyper- and hypoparathyroid rats. Scatchard analysis revealed that [125I]gentamicin bound with equal affinity to either membrane to a single class of noninteracting sites. The basolateral membrane had more binding sites than did the brush border, 28 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.3 nmol/mg of protein, respectively. Neither the affinity constants nor the number of binding sites were affected by the parathyroid hormone status of the donor animal. On the other hand, in the hypoparathyroid state the amount and the rate of gentamicin accumulation were less than in the hyperparathyroid state. The difference in accumulation cannot be explained on the basis of a change in the number or affinity of the putative receptor. Therefore, the alteration must reflect some difference subsequent to the binding site.

Volume 243, Issue 3, pp. 893-896, 12/01/1987
Copyright © 1987 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.