JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ringdahl, B.
Right arrow Articles by Jenden, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ringdahl, B.
Right arrow Articles by Jenden, D. J.

Regional differences in receptor reserve for analogs of oxotremorine in vivo: implications for development of selective muscarinic agonists

B Ringdahl, M Roch and DJ Jenden

The muscarinic actions of several analogs of oxotremorine were compared in the mouse. Compounds such as AKS 19 and BM 5 having low intrinsic efficacy (partial agonists) differentiated between centrally mediated muscarinic effects as they, like oxotremorine, were potent in producing analgesia and hypothermia but did not produce tremor. Instead they antagonized oxotremorine-induced tremor. They resembled oxotremorine in their ability to stimulate salivary secretion. Excellent correlations were found between the various muscarinic effects measured in vivo and spasmogenic activity on the guinea pig ileum and between tremorolytic potency and affinity for ileal muscarinic receptors. The results suggest that there are regional differences in the receptor reserve for muscarinic agonists that may affect in vivo responses to partial agonists in a qualitative manner. Responses to more efficacious agonists such as oxotremorine are affected only quantitatively by such differences. Efficacious agonists appeared to have a large receptor reserve with respect to salivation, analgesia and hypothermia, whereas their receptor reserve for the tremor response was lower. The possibility is raised of achieving selective muscarinic actions, even in the absence of distinct subtypes of muscarinic receptors, by exploiting regional differences in receptor density, in the efficiency of receptor-effector coupling and in endogenous levels of acetylcholine.

Volume 242, Issue 2, pp. 464-471, 08/01/1987
Copyright © 1987 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. M. Loudon, S. M. Bromidge, F. Brown, M. S. G. Clark, J. P. Hatcher, J. Hawkins, G. J. Riley, G. Noy, and B. S. Orlek
SB 202026: A Novel Muscarinic Partial Agonist with Functional Selectivity for M1 Receptors
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 1997; 283(3): 1059 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.