JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winsky, L.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winsky, L.
Right arrow Articles by Harvey, J. A.

Effects of N6-(L-phenylisopropyl)adenosine, caffeine, theophylline and rolipram on the acquisition of conditioned responses in the rabbit

L Winsky and JA Harvey

This study examined the effects of caffeine, theophylline and rolipram on the acquisition of conditioned responses in the rabbit and their ability to antagonize the retardant effects of the adenosine analog N6- (L-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (L-PIA) on acquisition. Pavlovian conditioning of nictitating membrane extension was accomplished by pairing the offset of a 800-msec tone- and light-conditioned stimulus with the onset of a 100-msec shock unconditioned stimulus to the skin just lateral to the outer canthus of the eye. L-PIA (5 mumol/kg) retarded the acquisition of conditioned responses to the tone- and light-conditioned stimuli, although theophylline (50-200 mumol/kg), caffeine (3-100 mumol/kg) and rolipram (0.03-3.0 mumol/kg) had no effect. The highest dose of caffeine used (300 mumol/kg) produced a small but significant enhancement of conditioned response acquisition in two of four experiments. The two adenosine antagonists theophylline (200 mumol/kg) and caffeine (300 mumol/kg) completely blocked the retardant effects of L-PIA on acquisition, although the phosphodiesterase inhibitor rolipram (3.0 mumol/kg) did not. In previously trained animals, L-PIA (5 mumol/kg) also increased the intensity threshold of a tone-conditioned stimulus for eliciting conditioned responses by more than 10 db. Theophylline (200 mumol/kg) and caffeine (300 mumol/kg) had no effect on the intensity threshold of the tone-conditioned stimulus but completely antagonized the effects of L-PIA. It was suggested that the depressant effects of the adenosine analog L-PIA on both the acquisition of conditioned responses and on the ability of a conditioned stimulus to elicit conditioned responses as soon as learning had occurred were mediated by adenosine receptors.

Volume 241, Issue 1, pp. 223-229, 04/01/1987
Copyright © 1987 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
J. Deckert and C. H. Gleiter
Adenosinergic psychopharmaceuticals: just an extra cup of coffee?
J Psychopharmacol, January 1, 1990; 4(4): 183 - 187.
[PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.