JPET xPharm- The Comprehensive Pharmacology Reference

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haye-Legrand, I.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haye-Legrand, I.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, C.

Histamine contraction of isolated human airway muscle preparations: role of prostaglandins

I Haye-Legrand, J Cerrina, B Raffestin, C Labat, C Boullet, A Bayol, J Benveniste and C Brink

Histamine concentration-effect curves were obtained using either an individual or cumulative dosing method. The maximal response to histamine in bronchial preparations using the individual dosing protocol was 0.25 +/- 0.03 g/mm2 and similar results were obtained using the cumulative method (0.24 +/- 0.03 g/mm2). The sensitivity (pD2 value) of isolated human bronchial muscle preparations was comparable for both the individual and cumulative methods (5.71 and 5.16, respectively). Prostaglandin (PG) E2 and PGF2 alpha contracted isolated human bronchial muscle preparations and the pD2 values were 5.64 and 5.59, respectively. PGE2 did not relax bronchial muscle preparations contracted with histamine (50 microM). At high concentrations prostacyclin (3 microM) relaxed histamine-contracted bronchial tissues but this effect was quite variable. Indomethacin (1.7 microM) did not affect basal tone in bronchial tissues. Isolated human bronchial preparations which were contracted maximally with histamine always released measurable quantities of PGs. In some experiments the rat stomach strip was used to detect the presence of these substances before and subsequent to the indomethacin (1.7 microM) treatment. The use of radioimmunoassay for PGE2 and PGF2 alpha confirmed these bioassay results. In a large number of experiments (18 preparations from 9 individual lung samples) the baseline production of PGs was PGE2, 22.9 +/- 2.8 pg/mg of tissue and PGF2 alpha, 11.9 +/- 2.5 pg/mg of tissue. Subsequent to histamine stimulation the quantities of PGs released were PGE2, 72.4 +/- 7.6 pg/mg of tissue and PGF2 alpha, 40.9 +/- 7.3 pg/mg of tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Volume 239, Issue 2, pp. 536-541, 11/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
J H Calvet, J-P Gascard, S Delamanche, and C Brink
Airway epithelial damage and release of inflammatory mediators in human lung parenchyma after sulfur mustard exposure
Human and Experimental Toxicology, February 1, 1999; 18(2): 77 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
P. J. Barnes, K. F. Chung, and C. P. Page
Inflammatory Mediators of Asthma: An Update
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 1998; 50(4): 515 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.