JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spealman, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergman, J.
Right arrow Articles by Spealman, R. D.

Some behavioral effects of histamine H1 antagonists in squirrel monkeys

J Bergman and RD Spealman

Graded dose of the histamine H1 antagonists tripelennamine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg), promethazine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg), diphenhydramine (0.3-10.0 mg/kg) and chlorpheniramine (0.3-1.7 mg/kg) increased rates of nonsuppressed responding under a second-order schedule of food presentation to a maximum beyond which responding was increased less or decreased. In contrast, the H2 antagonist, cimetidine, had no effect or decreased responding at the highest doses studied (56.0-100.0 mg/kg). Intermediate doses of tripelennamine, diphenhydramine and promethazine also increased rates of food-maintained responding that were suppressed by electric shock. Maximal increases in rates of suppressed responding were comparable to those produced by effective doses of chlordiazepoxide (3.0-10.0 mg/kg). Under identical conditions, clozapine (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) increased responding to a lesser extent, and d-amphetamine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) and cimetidine (3.0-100.0 mg/kg) either did not increase or, at the highest doses, only decreased rates of suppressed responding. Doses of tripelennamine and diphenhydramine that increased rates of nonsuppressed and suppressed responding also maintained self-administration in cocaine-trained squirrel monkeys under a second-order schedule of i.v. injection. Rates and patterns of responding maintained by tripelennamine and diphenhydramine were comparable to those maintained by cocaine and d-amphetamine under identical conditions. The results show that histamine H1 antagonists can have pronounced rate-increasing effects on nonsuppressed and suppressed behavior, and that they can serve as reinforcers in monkeys. These effects occur at doses that probably are greater than those required to saturate H1 sites of action in central nervous system and may not be mediated solely through histaminic mechanisms.

Volume 239, Issue 1, pp. 104-110, 10/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
V. C. Campbell, T. A. Kopajtic, A. H. Newman, and J. L. Katz
Assessment of the Influence of Histaminergic Actions on Cocaine-Like Effects of 3{alpha}-Diphenylmethoxytropane Analogs
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2005; 315(2): 631 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.