JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brody, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berlin, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Brody, T. M.

Lack of pharmacodynamic interactions between quinidine and digoxin in isolated atrial muscle of guinea pig heart

JR Berlin, T Akera and TM Brody

Quinidine has been reported to have no effect on the positive inotropic action of digoxin observed in isolated cardiac muscle preparations. This is surprising because quinidine has been shown to reduce Na+ influx in cardiac muscle. The conditions which increase Na+ influx stimulate the glycoside binding to Na+- and K+-activated Mg++-dependent ATP phosphohydrolase (Na+,K+-ATPase), and therefore quinidine may be expected to have an opposite effect. Thus, the effects of quinidine on cardiac muscle and its possible interactions with digoxin were re- evaluated using electrically paced left atrial muscle preparations of guinea pig heart. Quinidine caused a frequency- and concentration- dependent decrease in maximal upstroke velocity and amplitude of the action potential without altering resting membrane potential. In addition, quinidine prolonged action potential duration markedly in a frequency-dependent manner. Despite action potential prolongation, the alkaloid reduced net Na+ influx as determined by a decrease in steady- state ouabain-sensitive 86Rb+ uptake. Under these conditions, however, quinidine failed to reduce the rate of onset or the maximal positive inotropic effect of digoxin; or did it reduce digoxin binding to Na+,K+- ATPase in beating atrial muscle preparations. Benzocaine, which reduced net Na+ influx without increasing the action potential duration, also failed to affect the peak inotropic effect of digoxin or the glycoside binding. Quinidine had no direct effects on glycoside binding to isolated cardiac Na+,K+-ATPase. Moreover, [3H]ouabain binding to isolated enzyme was relatively insensitive to changes in Na+ concentrations between 1 and 8 mM although binding was stimulated clearly by Na+ above 8 mM. These results indicate that quinidine, at therapeutic concentrations, does not interact pharmacodynamically with digoxin in isolated cardiac muscle.

Volume 238, Issue 2, pp. 632-641, 08/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.