JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, D.

Analysis of cardiac muscarinic receptors recognized selectively by nonquaternary but not by quaternary ligands

JH Brown and D Goldstein

Three muscarinic receptor antagonists, [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]QNB), N-[3H]methylscopolamine ([3H]NMS and N-[methyl-3H]QNB ([3H]NMeQNB), each bind to an apparently homogeneous population of receptors on intact chick heart cells. [3H]QNB binds to approximately 9500 sites/cells, whereas [3H]NMS and [3H]NMeQNB bind to approximately 5000 sites/cell. Atropine and scopolamine compete with all three radioligands with a single, high affinity. Their quaternary analogs N- methylatropine and NMS and the quaternary agonist carbachol also show a single affinity for [3H]NMS and [3H]NMeQNB binding sites, but have biphasic competition curves for [3H]QNB sites with low "apparent" affinity for a subpopulation of sites. When 10 nM or greater propylbenzilylcholine mustard is used to alkylate receptors virtually all [3H]NMS binding is abolished, whereas [3H]QNB still labels a significant fraction of the binding sites seen in control cells. The sites with low apparent affinity for quaternary ligands are shown to have characteristics of muscarinic receptors, but do not appear necessary for muscarinic receptor-mediated phosphoinositide hydrolysis. We suggest that a subpopulation of nonfunctional muscarinic receptors are sequestered within the membrane or otherwise inaccessible to hydrophilic or charged ligands.

Volume 238, Issue 2, pp. 580-586, 08/01/1986
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
S. D. C. Ward, C. A. M. Curtis, and E. C. Hulme
Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis of Transmembrane Domain 6 of the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Suggests that Tyr381 Plays Key Roles in Receptor Function
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 1999; 56(5): 1031 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.